PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEC vs. HBM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UEC vs. HBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEC achieves a -5.57% return, which is significantly lower than HBM's 40.23% return. Over the past 10 years, UEC has outperformed HBM with an annualized return of 27.01%, while HBM has yielded a comparatively lower 19.31% annualized return.


UEC

1D
3.76%
1M
-28.24%
YTD
-5.57%
6M
-14.63%
1Y
77.05%
3Y*
51.69%
5Y*
28.08%
10Y*
27.01%

HBM

1D
4.43%
1M
0.32%
YTD
40.23%
6M
49.02%
1Y
189.83%
3Y*
78.89%
5Y*
31.42%
10Y*
19.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEC vs. HBM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.
-5.57%74.59%4.53%64.95%15.82%90.34%91.47%-26.46%-29.38%58.04%
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
40.23%145.46%47.03%9.24%-29.87%3.82%69.50%-11.77%-46.20%54.77%

Correlation

The correlation between UEC and HBM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2009

0.36

The correlation between UEC and HBM shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UEC:

$5.41B

HBM:

$11.09B

EPS

UEC:

-$0.22

HBM:

$1.65

PS Ratio

UEC:

257.79

HBM:

4.68

PB Ratio

UEC:

3.81

HBM:

3.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

UEC:

$20.20M

HBM:

$2.37B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UEC:

-$18.26M

HBM:

$828.54M

EBITDA (TTM)

UEC:

-$114.96M

HBM:

$1.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEC vs. HBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEC
UEC Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
UEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
UEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

HBM
HBM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
HBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBM Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEC vs. HBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UECHBMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.44

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

5.28

-3.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.58

16.41

-12.83

UEC vs. HBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEC Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the HBM Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEC and HBM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UEC vs. HBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEC drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, which is greater than HBM's maximum drawdown of -92.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEC and HBM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UECHBMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.40%

-92.21%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.23%

-36.16%

-17.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.49%

-41.11%

-12.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.76%

-63.33%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.59%

-86.34%

+5.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.23%

-12.68%

-32.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.08%

-52.45%

-9.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.62%

11.62%

+10.00%

Volatility

UEC vs. HBM - Volatility Comparison

Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) has a higher volatility of 35.27% compared to Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) at 25.87%. This indicates that UEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UECHBMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.27%

25.87%

+9.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.37%

47.72%

+13.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.21%

59.13%

+20.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.87%

55.51%

+19.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.94%

58.82%

+15.12%

Dividends

UEC vs. HBM - Dividend Comparison

UEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
0.08%0.07%0.17%0.31%0.32%0.22%0.21%0.36%0.38%0.23%0.35%0.52%
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

UEC vs. HBM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Uranium Energy Corp. and Hudbay Minerals Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M202220232024202520260
745.43M
(UEC) Total Revenue
(HBM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UEC and HBM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UEC has higher volatility (35.27%) compared to HBM (25.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UEC dropped -97.40% vs HBM's -92.21%.

HBM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEC and HBM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer