UEC vs. DNN

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UEC having a -21.23% return and DNN slightly higher at -21.11%. Over the past 10 years, UEC has outperformed DNN with an annualized return of 7.34%, while DNN has yielded a comparatively lower 4.11% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) and Denison Mines Corp (DNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current UEC Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is higher than the DNN Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEC and DNN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither UEC nor DNN has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum UEC drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, roughly equal to the maximum DNN drawdown of -98.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEC and DNN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) is 20.51%, while Denison Mines Corp (DNN) has a volatility of 21.78%. This indicates that UEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Uranium Energy Corp. and Denison Mines Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.