PortfoliosLab logo
HBM vs. SCCO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HBM and SCCO is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HBM vs. SCCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
102.41%
1,128.14%
HBM
SCCO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HBM:

-0.22

SCCO:

-0.50

Sortino Ratio

HBM:

0.15

SCCO:

-0.43

Omega Ratio

HBM:

1.02

SCCO:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

HBM:

-0.14

SCCO:

-0.47

Martin Ratio

HBM:

-0.43

SCCO:

-0.88

Ulcer Index

HBM:

20.74%

SCCO:

21.03%

Daily Std Dev

HBM:

54.95%

SCCO:

40.19%

Max Drawdown

HBM:

-92.24%

SCCO:

-78.64%

Current Drawdown

HBM:

-55.42%

SCCO:

-27.51%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HBM:

$3.06B

SCCO:

$72.48B

EPS

HBM:

$0.20

SCCO:

$4.49

PE Ratio

HBM:

38.55

SCCO:

20.08

PEG Ratio

HBM:

2.09

SCCO:

1.20

PS Ratio

HBM:

1.51

SCCO:

6.06

PB Ratio

HBM:

1.18

SCCO:

7.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

HBM:

$1.48B

SCCO:

$11.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HBM:

$500.26M

SCCO:

$6.05B

EBITDA (TTM)

HBM:

$590.08M

SCCO:

$6.88B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBM achieves a -4.72% return, which is significantly lower than SCCO's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, HBM has underperformed SCCO with an annualized return of -2.22%, while SCCO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.90% annualized return.


HBM

YTD

-4.72%

1M

10.94%

6M

-17.46%

1Y

-11.81%

5Y*

25.68%

10Y*

-2.22%

SCCO

YTD

0.47%

1M

7.67%

6M

-14.52%

1Y

-19.93%

5Y*

27.08%

10Y*

14.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HBM vs. SCCO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HBM is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HBM is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HBM is 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HBM is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HBM is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HBM is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

SCCO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCCO is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCCO is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCCO is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCCO is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCCO is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCCO is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HBM vs. SCCO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) and Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HBM Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is higher than the SCCO Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBM and SCCO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.22
-0.50
HBM
SCCO

Dividends

HBM vs. SCCO - Dividend Comparison

HBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than SCCO's 2.98% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
0.18%0.17%0.25%0.32%0.22%0.21%0.37%0.34%0.17%0.26%0.42%0.21%
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation
2.98%2.27%4.61%5.74%5.14%2.28%4.77%4.51%1.23%0.56%1.29%1.62%

Drawdowns

HBM vs. SCCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBM drawdown since its inception was -92.24%, which is greater than SCCO's maximum drawdown of -78.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBM and SCCO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-55.42%
-27.51%
HBM
SCCO

Volatility

HBM vs. SCCO - Volatility Comparison

Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) has a higher volatility of 12.19% compared to Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) at 10.79%. This indicates that HBM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
12.19%
10.79%
HBM
SCCO

Financials

HBM vs. SCCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hudbay Minerals Inc. and Southern Copper Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20212022202320242025
584.92M
3.12B
(HBM) Total Revenue
(SCCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HBM vs. SCCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hudbay Minerals Inc. and Southern Copper Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
52.4%
50.2%
(HBM) Gross Margin
(SCCO) Gross Margin
HBM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a gross profit of 306.66M and revenue of 584.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.

SCCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Southern Copper Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.57B and revenue of 3.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.2%.

HBM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported an operating income of 138.13M and revenue of 584.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.6%.

SCCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Southern Copper Corporation reported an operating income of 1.54B and revenue of 3.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.2%.

HBM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hudbay Minerals Inc. reported a net income of 21.16M and revenue of 584.92M, resulting in a net margin of 3.6%.

SCCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Southern Copper Corporation reported a net income of 945.90M and revenue of 3.12B, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.