PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
UEC vs. CCJ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


UECCCJ
YTD Return20.00%26.24%
1Y Return28.64%24.67%
3Y Return (Ann)12.03%25.90%
5Y Return (Ann)50.53%42.92%
10Y Return (Ann)15.59%12.46%
Sharpe Ratio0.610.65
Sortino Ratio1.221.16
Omega Ratio1.151.14
Calmar Ratio0.750.84
Martin Ratio1.692.02
Ulcer Index21.41%14.00%
Daily Std Dev59.75%43.76%
Max Drawdown-97.40%-87.87%
Current Drawdown-9.22%-6.22%

Fundamentals


UECCCJ
Market Cap$3.16B$23.68B
EPS-$0.07$0.20
PEG Ratio0.003.33
Total Revenue (TTM)$116.00K$2.08B
Gross Profit (TTM)-$11.47M$422.03M
EBITDA (TTM)-$27.56M$398.87M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between UEC and CCJ is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

UEC vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, UEC achieves a 20.00% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 26.24% return. Over the past 10 years, UEC has outperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 15.59%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively lower 12.46% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.04%
8.88%
UEC
CCJ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UEC vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UEC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UEC, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for UEC, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.22
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for UEC, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.15
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for UEC, currently valued at 0.75, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.75
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for UEC, currently valued at 1.69, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.69
CCJ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CCJ, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.65
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CCJ, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CCJ, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.14
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CCJ, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.84
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CCJ, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.02

UEC vs. CCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEC Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is comparable to the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEC and CCJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.61
0.65
UEC
CCJ

Dividends

UEC vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

UEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.16%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%3.36%2.88%2.50%2.19%1.85%

Drawdowns

UEC vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEC drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEC and CCJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-9.22%
-6.22%
UEC
CCJ

Volatility

UEC vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) has a higher volatility of 17.05% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 13.08%. This indicates that UEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.05%
13.08%
UEC
CCJ

Financials

UEC vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Uranium Energy Corp. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items