PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEC vs. CCJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

UEC vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UEC vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.
15.58%74.59%4.53%64.95%15.82%90.34%91.47%-26.46%-29.38%58.04%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
18.71%78.38%19.47%90.49%4.35%63.19%51.47%-21.08%23.58%-8.20%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UEC:

$6.54B

CCJ:

$47.30B

EPS

UEC:

-$0.18

CCJ:

$1.35

PS Ratio

UEC:

305.37

CCJ:

13.59

PB Ratio

UEC:

4.63

CCJ:

6.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

UEC:

$20.20M

CCJ:

$3.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UEC:

$5.72M

CCJ:

$1.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

UEC:

-$104.07M

CCJ:

$1.05B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEC achieves a 15.58% return, which is significantly lower than CCJ's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, UEC has outperformed CCJ with an annualized return of 33.12%, while CCJ has yielded a comparatively lower 25.21% annualized return.


UEC

1D
7.83%
1M
-11.94%
YTD
15.58%
6M
1.20%
1Y
182.43%
3Y*
67.36%
5Y*
33.28%
10Y*
33.12%

CCJ

1D
5.61%
1M
-8.27%
YTD
18.71%
6M
29.77%
1Y
164.39%
3Y*
61.02%
5Y*
44.84%
10Y*
25.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEC vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEC
UEC Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
UEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
UEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

CCJ
CCJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
CCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEC vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UECCCJDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

3.03

-0.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.93

3.56

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.44

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

6.23

-1.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.42

16.57

-6.15

UEC vs. CCJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the CCJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEC and CCJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UECCCJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

3.03

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.91

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.55

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.24

-0.19

Correlation

The correlation between UEC and CCJ is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

UEC vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison

UEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CCJ
Cameco Corporation
0.16%0.19%0.22%0.20%0.39%0.29%0.46%0.67%0.53%4.33%3.82%3.24%

Drawdowns

UEC vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEC drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, which is greater than CCJ's maximum drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEC and CCJ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UECCCJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.40%

-87.53%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.97%

-25.69%

-14.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.76%

-40.01%

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.59%

-57.22%

-23.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.97%

-19.00%

-13.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.42%

-46.29%

-16.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.47%

9.67%

+6.80%

Volatility

UEC vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison

Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) has a higher volatility of 23.02% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 17.51%. This indicates that UEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UECCCJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.02%

17.51%

+5.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.81%

41.70%

+15.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.25%

54.64%

+21.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.64%

49.71%

+24.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.48%

46.28%

+27.20%

Financials

UEC vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Uranium Energy Corp. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
20.20M
1.20B
(UEC) Total Revenue
(CCJ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items