HBM vs. ^TNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX).
Performance
HBM vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HBM vs. ^TNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc. | 10.87% | 145.46% | 47.03% | 9.24% | -29.87% | 3.82% | 69.50% | -11.77% | -46.20% | 54.77% |
^TNX Treasury Yield 10 Years | 3.75% | -8.97% | 18.29% | -0.34% | 156.55% | 64.89% | -52.21% | -28.56% | 11.68% | -1.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBM achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly higher than ^TNX's 3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, HBM has outperformed ^TNX with an annualized return of 20.12%, while ^TNX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.
HBM
- 1D
- 5.26%
- 1M
- -17.70%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 6M
- 43.18%
- 1Y
- 185.98%
- 3Y*
- 61.54%
- 5Y*
- 25.04%
- 10Y*
- 20.12%
^TNX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- 20.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBM vs. ^TNX — Risk / Return Rank
HBM
^TNX
HBM vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBM | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.31 | 0.22 | +3.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.40 | 0.45 | +2.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.05 | +0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.26 | 0.12 | +5.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.82 | 0.21 | +18.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBM | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.31 | 0.22 | +3.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.63 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.19 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | -0.02 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between HBM and ^TNX is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Drawdowns
HBM vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBM drawdown since its inception was -92.21%, roughly equal to the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -93.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBM and ^TNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBM | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.21% | -93.78% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.16% | -13.99% | -22.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.47% | -31.74% | -33.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.34% | -84.57% | -1.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.32% | -46.17% | +23.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.92% | -51.38% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.10% | 8.39% | +1.71% |
Volatility
HBM vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison
Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) has a higher volatility of 20.94% compared to Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) at 5.89%. This indicates that HBM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HBM | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.94% | 5.89% | +15.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.64% | 10.58% | +32.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.55% | 17.89% | +38.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.17% | 32.96% | +22.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.46% | 48.18% | +11.28% |