PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UEC vs. DML.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UEC vs. DML.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) and Denison Mines Corp. (DML.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UEC is traded in USD, while DML.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the DML.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UEC achieves a 20.63% return, which is significantly lower than DML.TO's 28.61% return. Over the past 10 years, UEC has outperformed DML.TO with an annualized return of 31.30%, while DML.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.74% annualized return.


UEC

1D
-8.74%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
20.63%
6M
8.80%
1Y
121.54%
3Y*
66.37%
5Y*
33.60%
10Y*
31.30%

DML.TO

1D
-6.52%
1M
-9.09%
YTD
28.61%
6M
26.56%
1Y
102.57%
3Y*
42.89%
5Y*
20.09%
10Y*
20.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UEC vs. DML.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UEC
Uranium Energy Corp.
20.63%74.59%4.53%64.95%15.82%90.34%91.47%-26.46%-29.38%58.04%
DML.TO
Denison Mines Corp.
28.61%46.15%3.61%53.09%-16.88%108.67%58.67%-10.00%-15.79%5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between UEC and DML.TO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2009

0.49

Over the past year, UEC and DML.TO have become more correlated (0.78) than their long-term average of 0.49, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UEC:

$6.82B

DML.TO:

CA$4.28B

EPS

UEC:

-$0.18

DML.TO:

-CA$0.32

PS Ratio

UEC:

324.99

DML.TO:

918.75

PB Ratio

UEC:

4.83

DML.TO:

16.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

UEC:

$20.20M

DML.TO:

CA$4.65M

Gross Profit (TTM)

UEC:

$5.72M

DML.TO:

-CA$43.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

UEC:

-$104.07M

DML.TO:

-CA$141.96M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UEC vs. DML.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UEC
UEC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
UEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DML.TO
DML.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DML.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DML.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DML.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DML.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DML.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UEC vs. DML.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) and Denison Mines Corp. (DML.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UECDML.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

3.46

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.98

8.06

-2.08

UEC vs. DML.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the DML.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UEC and DML.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UECDML.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

1.70

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.32

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.32

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.05

-0.01

Drawdowns

UEC vs. DML.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UEC drawdown since its inception was -97.40%, roughly equal to the maximum DML.TO drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEC and DML.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UECDML.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.40%

-94.44%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.86%

-29.79%

-11.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.49%

-52.66%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.76%

-55.21%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.59%

-75.20%

-5.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.04%

-21.84%

-8.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.12%

-64.90%

+2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.41%

12.78%

+7.63%

Volatility

UEC vs. DML.TO - Volatility Comparison

Uranium Energy Corp. (UEC) has a higher volatility of 27.23% compared to Denison Mines Corp. (DML.TO) at 17.10%. This indicates that UEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DML.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UECDML.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.23%

17.10%

+10.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.08%

44.94%

+12.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.21%

61.69%

+14.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.08%

62.37%

+11.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.87%

64.25%

+9.62%

Dividends

UEC vs. DML.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither UEC nor DML.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

UEC vs. DML.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Uranium Energy Corp. and Denison Mines Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-10.00M0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
20.20M
1.11M
(UEC) Total Revenue
(DML.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. UEC values in USD, DML.TO values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


UEC and DML.TO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UEC and DML.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer