DML.TO vs. EFR.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Denison Mines Corp. (DML.TO) and Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO).
Performance
DML.TO vs. EFR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DML.TO vs. EFR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DML.TO Denison Mines Corp. | 35.44% | 39.46% | 12.50% | 49.68% | -10.92% | 107.14% | 55.56% | -14.29% | -8.70% | -1.43% |
EFR.TO Energy Fuels Inc. | 28.32% | 169.01% | -22.21% | 13.37% | -13.25% | 78.89% | 117.74% | -35.92% | 71.24% | 2.26% |
Fundamentals
DML.TO:
CA$4.44B
EFR.TO:
CA$6.13B
DML.TO:
-CA$0.24
EFR.TO:
-CA$0.37
DML.TO:
902.65
EFR.TO:
89.36
DML.TO:
12.07
EFR.TO:
9.04
DML.TO:
CA$4.92M
EFR.TO:
CA$65.92M
DML.TO:
-CA$23.94M
EFR.TO:
CA$9.65M
DML.TO:
-CA$171.25M
EFR.TO:
-CA$84.69M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DML.TO achieves a 35.44% return, which is significantly higher than EFR.TO's 28.32% return. Over the past 10 years, DML.TO has underperformed EFR.TO with an annualized return of 21.05%, while EFR.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 24.16% annualized return.
DML.TO
- 1D
- 7.41%
- 1M
- -13.20%
- YTD
- 35.44%
- 6M
- 28.72%
- 1Y
- 162.23%
- 3Y*
- 49.68%
- 5Y*
- 27.21%
- 10Y*
- 21.05%
EFR.TO
- 1D
- 11.30%
- 1M
- -12.43%
- YTD
- 28.32%
- 6M
- 19.37%
- 1Y
- 378.61%
- 3Y*
- 50.12%
- 5Y*
- 27.67%
- 10Y*
- 24.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DML.TO vs. EFR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DML.TO
EFR.TO
DML.TO vs. EFR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Denison Mines Corp. (DML.TO) and Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DML.TO | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.60 | 3.96 | -1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.08 | 3.58 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.43 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.41 | 7.34 | -1.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.89 | 16.76 | -1.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DML.TO | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 3.96 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.39 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.35 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.02 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between DML.TO and EFR.TO is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DML.TO vs. EFR.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither DML.TO nor EFR.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DML.TO vs. EFR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DML.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.88%, roughly equal to the maximum EFR.TO drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DML.TO and EFR.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DML.TO | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.88% | -99.57% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.20% | -51.09% | +21.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.05% | -64.59% | +11.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.39% | -78.32% | +4.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.92% | -90.46% | +26.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.75% | -81.40% | +7.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.62% | 22.38% | -11.76% |
Volatility
DML.TO vs. EFR.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Denison Mines Corp. (DML.TO) is 20.22%, while Energy Fuels Inc. (EFR.TO) has a volatility of 24.65%. This indicates that DML.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DML.TO | EFR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.22% | 24.65% | -4.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.60% | 73.90% | -28.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.80% | 96.43% | -33.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.97% | 71.46% | -10.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.42% | 70.17% | -7.75% |
Financials
DML.TO vs. EFR.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Denison Mines Corp. and Energy Fuels Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities