DML.TO vs. URG
Compare and contrast key facts about Denison Mines Corp. (DML.TO) and Ur-Energy Inc. (URG).
Performance
DML.TO vs. URG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DML.TO vs. URG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DML.TO Denison Mines Corp. | 39.29% | 39.46% | 12.50% | 49.68% | -10.92% | 107.14% | 55.56% | -14.29% | -8.70% | -1.43% |
URG Ur-Energy Inc. | 4.91% | 15.33% | -18.91% | 30.96% | 0.98% | 50.90% | 33.84% | -13.91% | 3.15% | 20.52% |
Different Trading Currencies
DML.TO is traded in CAD, while URG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URG values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
DML.TO:
CA$4.57B
URG:
$544.56M
DML.TO:
-CA$0.24
URG:
-$0.20
DML.TO:
928.28
URG:
19.59
DML.TO:
12.41
URG:
7.03
DML.TO:
CA$4.92M
URG:
$27.21M
DML.TO:
-CA$23.94M
URG:
-$17.73M
DML.TO:
-CA$171.25M
URG:
-$70.31M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DML.TO achieves a 39.29% return, which is significantly higher than URG's 4.91% return. Over the past 10 years, DML.TO has outperformed URG with an annualized return of 21.39%, while URG has yielded a comparatively lower 11.69% annualized return.
DML.TO
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -15.08%
- YTD
- 39.29%
- 6M
- 31.35%
- 1Y
- 169.68%
- 3Y*
- 51.09%
- 5Y*
- 27.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.39%
URG
- 1D
- -3.49%
- 1M
- -15.89%
- YTD
- 4.91%
- 6M
- -18.41%
- 1Y
- 111.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DML.TO vs. URG — Risk / Return Rank
DML.TO
URG
DML.TO vs. URG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Denison Mines Corp. (DML.TO) and Ur-Energy Inc. (URG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DML.TO | URG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.72 | 1.50 | +1.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.15 | 2.18 | +0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.26 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.81 | 2.33 | +3.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.92 | 5.05 | +10.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DML.TO | URG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 1.50 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.09 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.18 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.10 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between DML.TO and URG is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DML.TO vs. URG - Dividend Comparison
Neither DML.TO nor URG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
DML.TO vs. URG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DML.TO drawdown since its inception was -97.88%, which is greater than URG's maximum drawdown of -87.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DML.TO and URG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DML.TO | URG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.88% | -91.13% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.20% | -45.71% | +16.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.05% | -73.30% | +20.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.39% | -73.30% | -0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -62.89% | -55.96% | -6.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.75% | -66.73% | -7.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.66% | 20.41% | -9.75% |
Volatility
DML.TO vs. URG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Denison Mines Corp. (DML.TO) is 18.68%, while Ur-Energy Inc. (URG) has a volatility of 22.82%. This indicates that DML.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DML.TO | URG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.68% | 22.82% | -4.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.65% | 49.47% | -3.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.81% | 74.63% | -11.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.88% | 65.44% | -4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.41% | 64.61% | -2.20% |
Financials
DML.TO vs. URG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Denison Mines Corp. and Ur-Energy Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities