PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDOW vs. GUSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDOW vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDOW achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 61.19% return. Over the past 10 years, UDOW has outperformed GUSH with an annualized return of 23.82%, while GUSH has yielded a comparatively lower -36.52% annualized return.


UDOW

1D
2.07%
1M
8.49%
YTD
14.65%
6M
11.42%
1Y
51.98%
3Y*
32.31%
5Y*
13.79%
10Y*
23.82%

GUSH

1D
2.06%
1M
-5.00%
YTD
61.19%
6M
49.15%
1Y
49.53%
3Y*
8.93%
5Y*
9.46%
10Y*
-36.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDOW vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
14.65%24.46%28.47%32.72%-32.39%65.67%-17.15%75.24%-23.86%99.07%
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
61.19%-19.39%-12.73%-7.23%66.47%129.94%-97.38%-52.68%-74.28%-40.21%

Correlation

The correlation between UDOW and GUSH is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015

0.46

The correlation between UDOW and GUSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UDOW vs. GUSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDOW
GUSH

Financial Services

27.2%

-

Industrials

18.4%

-

Technology

17.1%

-

Healthcare

13.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Basic Materials

4.0%
2.9%

Energy

2.4%
97.2%

Communication Services

1.9%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

UDOW
27.2%
GUSH

-

Industrials

UDOW
18.4%
GUSH

-

Technology

UDOW
17.1%
GUSH

-

Healthcare

UDOW
13.1%
GUSH

-

Consumer Cyclical

UDOW
11.6%
GUSH

-

Consumer Defensive

UDOW
4.4%
GUSH

-

Basic Materials

UDOW
4.0%
GUSH
2.9%

Energy

UDOW
2.4%
GUSH
97.2%

Communication Services

UDOW
1.9%
GUSH

-

Real Estate

UDOW

-

GUSH

-

Utilities

UDOW

-

GUSH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDOW vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDOW
UDOW Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
UDOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDOW Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
UDOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDOW Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDOW vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UDOWGUSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.17

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

1.72

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.59

3.77

+2.82

UDOW vs. GUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the GUSH Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDOW and GUSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UDOW vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDOW drawdown since its inception was -80.29%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDOW and GUSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDOWGUSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.29%

-99.98%

+19.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.07%

-28.94%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.83%

-63.59%

+18.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.79%

-73.64%

+17.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.29%

-99.94%

+19.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-99.80%

+97.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.37%

-92.90%

+78.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.94%

13.16%

-5.22%

Volatility

UDOW vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Dow30 (UDOW) is 12.92%, while Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a volatility of 18.07%. This indicates that UDOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDOWGUSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.92%

18.07%

-5.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.12%

44.41%

-15.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.38%

56.06%

-18.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.39%

68.35%

-23.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.84%

93.58%

-41.74%

UDOW vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDOW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDOW vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison

UDOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than GUSH's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.55%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%0.00%
UDOW
ProShares UltraPro Dow30
1.18%1.38%0.95%0.95%0.83%0.26%0.19%0.61%0.73%0.13%0.26%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDOW and GUSH have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GUSH has higher volatility (18.07%) compared to UDOW (12.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDOW dropped -80.29% vs GUSH's -99.98%.

On 10-year performance, UDOW leads with 23.82% vs -36.52% for GUSH. On fees, UDOW is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UDOW has been the lower-risk option at 12.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UDOW has performed better with a 23.82% return vs -36.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UDOW is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.

GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 1.18% for UDOW.

UDOW tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average (300%), while GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UDOW and 1.17% for GUSH.

UDOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDOW and GUSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer