PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDIV vs. INCE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDIV vs. INCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDIV achieves a 14.99% return, which is significantly higher than INCE's 13.04% return.


UDIV

1D
-0.69%
1M
6.05%
YTD
14.99%
6M
14.91%
1Y
33.63%
3Y*
24.66%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*

INCE

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.34%
YTD
13.04%
6M
14.26%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDIV vs. INCE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
14.99%19.00%25.61%25.21%-15.00%19.66%5.54%24.60%-8.83%17.44%
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
13.04%15.92%10.70%13.87%-8.54%23.36%12.33%32.72%-2.14%19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between UDIV and INCE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.73

The correlation between UDIV and INCE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UDIV vs. INCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDIV
INCE

Technology

39.0%
7.6%

Financial Services

11.3%
10.5%

Communication Services

10.7%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
2.2%

Healthcare

7.4%
4.3%

Industrials

5.8%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
9.3%

Energy

3.7%
8.1%

Real Estate

3.7%

-

Utilities

3.0%
6.4%

Basic Materials

0.8%
4.5%

Technology

UDIV
39.0%
INCE
7.6%

Financial Services

UDIV
11.3%
INCE
10.5%

Communication Services

UDIV
10.7%
INCE
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

UDIV
8.7%
INCE
2.2%

Healthcare

UDIV
7.4%
INCE
4.3%

Industrials

UDIV
5.8%
INCE
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

UDIV
5.7%
INCE
9.3%

Energy

UDIV
3.7%
INCE
8.1%

Real Estate

UDIV
3.7%
INCE

-

Utilities

UDIV
3.0%
INCE
6.4%

Basic Materials

UDIV
0.8%
INCE
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDIV vs. INCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDIV
UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

INCE
INCE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
INCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
INCE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
INCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
INCE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDIV vs. INCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UDIVINCEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.61

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

5.52

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.28

20.83

-2.54

UDIV vs. INCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the INCE Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDIV and INCE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UDIVINCEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

3.26

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.84

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.84

-0.10

Drawdowns

UDIV vs. INCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDIV drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, roughly equal to the maximum INCE drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDIV and INCE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDIVINCEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-33.95%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-4.90%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-14.01%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.18%

-18.40%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-0.76%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.64%

-3.25%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

1.30%

+0.54%

Volatility

UDIV vs. INCE - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF (INCE) at 2.02%. This indicates that UDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDIVINCEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

2.02%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.99%

5.96%

+3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.95%

8.32%

+3.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

13.27%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.27%

15.69%

+0.58%

UDIV vs. INCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDIV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than INCE's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

UDIV vs. INCE - Dividend Comparison

UDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than INCE's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
INCE
Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF
4.73%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
1.40%1.53%2.05%1.91%3.20%2.97%2.90%3.40%3.74%3.47%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


UDIV and INCE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UDIV has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to INCE (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDIV dropped -35.21% vs INCE's -33.95%.

On 5-year performance, UDIV leads with 14.04% vs 11.11% for INCE. On fees, UDIV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, INCE has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UDIV has performed better with a 14.04% return vs 11.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UDIV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for INCE.

INCE has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 1.40% for UDIV.

Their fees differ too: 0.06% for UDIV and 0.29% for INCE.

INCE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDIV and INCE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer