PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDIV vs. EZBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UDIV vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UDIV vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
-2.52%19.00%25.42%
EZBC
Franklin Bitcoin ETF
-22.55%-6.56%100.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDIV achieves a -2.52% return, which is significantly higher than EZBC's -22.55% return.


UDIV

1D
2.84%
1M
-4.47%
YTD
-2.52%
6M
-0.60%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*

EZBC

1D
1.90%
1M
3.29%
YTD
-22.55%
6M
-40.81%
1Y
-17.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UDIV vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDIV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

UDIV vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDIV
UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

EZBC
EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDIV vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UDIVEZBCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

-0.40

+1.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

-0.29

+1.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.97

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

-0.39

+1.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.86

-0.84

+8.70

UDIV vs. EZBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the EZBC Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDIV and EZBC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UDIVEZBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

-0.40

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.36

+0.28

Correlation

The correlation between UDIV and EZBC is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

UDIV vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

UDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
1.66%1.53%2.05%1.91%3.20%2.97%2.90%3.40%3.74%3.47%1.63%
EZBC
Franklin Bitcoin ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UDIV vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDIV drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -49.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDIV and EZBC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UDIVEZBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-49.37%

+14.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.98%

-49.37%

+36.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.84%

-46.09%

+40.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-14.12%

+9.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

23.07%

-20.43%

Volatility

UDIV vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) is 5.29%, while Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) has a volatility of 13.08%. This indicates that UDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UDIVEZBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

13.08%

-7.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.60%

36.80%

-27.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.59%

45.40%

-26.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.48%

51.13%

-35.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.34%

51.13%

-34.79%