UDI vs. MFVL
UDI (USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UDI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFVL.
Performance
UDI vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UDI achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's 1.07% return.
UDI
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 10.96%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 24.01%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UDI vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UDI USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund | 10.96% | 2.02% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 1.07% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between UDI and MFVL is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UDI vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank
UDI
MFVL
UDI vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund (UDI) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UDI | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.26 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UDI | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.43 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
UDI vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UDI drawdown since its inception was -14.17%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDI and MFVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UDI | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.17% | -7.03% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.63% | +2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -2.42% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.48% | — | — |
Volatility
UDI vs. MFVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UDI | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.26% | 12.14% | -1.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 12.14% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.05% | 12.14% | +1.91% |
UDI vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UDI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UDI vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison
UDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UDI USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund | 2.46% | 2.42% | 5.33% | 2.61% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UDI and MFVL have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFVL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFVL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UDI.
UDI has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: USCF Advisers and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for UDI and 0.50% for MFVL.
Find the right allocation for UDI and MFVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer