UDI vs. TMDV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

UDI (USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund) and TMDV (ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UDI is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by USCF Advisers, while TMDV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index. UDI is actively managed, while TMDV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UDI returned 16.92%/yr vs 5.99%/yr for TMDV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UDI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for TMDV.

Performance

UDI vs. TMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund (UDI) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDI achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than TMDV's 7.63% return.

UDI

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 11.29%
• 6M: 10.89%
• 1Y: 23.88%
• 3Y*: 16.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMDV

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 1.86%
• YTD: 7.63%
• 6M: 6.59%
• 1Y: 11.78%
• 3Y*: 5.99%
• 5Y*: 3.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDI vs. TMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
UDI USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund	11.29%	14.23%	17.07%	6.35%	3.14%
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	7.63%	2.91%	2.64%	2.25%	1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between UDI and TMDV is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2022	0.87

The correlation between UDI and TMDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

UDI vs. TMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UDI	TMDV
Financial Services	28.3%	16.1%
Healthcare	16.6%	5.4%
Energy	11.4%	2.8%
Real Estate	10.2%	4.8%
Utilities	8.1%	12.2%
Technology	7.9%	1.6%
Communication Services	5.0%	-
Basic Materials	4.1%	12.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	23.5%
Industrials	2.5%	16.0%
Consumer Cyclical	2.1%	5.5%

Return for Risk

UDI vs. TMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDI

UDI Risk / Return Rank: 78
UDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
UDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
UDI Omega Ratio Rank: 71
UDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
UDI Martin Ratio Rank: 82

TMDV

TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 26
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 25
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDI vs. TMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund (UDI) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UDI	TMDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	0.97	+1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	1.51	+1.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.17	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.24	1.20	+3.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.04	2.91	+13.13

UDI vs. TMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDI Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the TMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDI and TMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UDI vs. TMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDI drawdown since its inception was -14.17%, smaller than the maximum TMDV drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDI and TMDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	UDI	TMDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.17%	-33.42%	+19.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.66%	-9.82%	+4.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.17%	-16.02%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.65%	-3.79%	+2.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.07%	-5.42%	+2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.49%	4.06%	-2.57%

Volatility

UDI vs. TMDV - Volatility Comparison

USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund (UDI) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) have volatilities of 3.33% and 3.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UDI	TMDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	3.21%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.17%	8.62%	-1.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.29%	12.20%	-1.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.02%	14.41%	-0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.02%	18.60%	-4.58%

UDI vs. TMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TMDV's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

UDI vs. TMDV - Dividend Comparison

UDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than TMDV's 2.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	2.55%	2.65%	2.70%	2.45%	2.46%	2.14%	2.28%	0.16%
UDI USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund	2.45%	2.42%	5.33%	2.61%	1.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UDI and TMDV in my portfolio?

UDI and TMDV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UDI or TMDV?

UDI has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to TMDV (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDI dropped -14.17% vs TMDV's -33.42%.

Which ETF is better, UDI or TMDV?

On 3-year performance, UDI leads with 16.92% vs 5.99% for TMDV. On fees, TMDV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TMDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UDI or TMDV?

Over the 3-year period, UDI has performed better with a 16.92% return vs 5.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UDI or TMDV?

TMDV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UDI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UDI or TMDV?

TMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.45% for UDI.

What is the main difference between UDI and TMDV?

UDI is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while TMDV is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: USCF Advisers and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for UDI and 0.35% for TMDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.