UDI vs. FDL
UDI (USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. UDI is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, UDI returned 16.92%/yr vs 18.63%/yr for FDL. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UDI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
UDI vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UDI having a 11.29% return and FDL slightly higher at 11.33%.
UDI
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- 1Y
- 23.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -3.91%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- 21.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
UDI vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UDI USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund | 11.29% | 14.23% | 17.07% | 6.35% | 3.14% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 11.33% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 2.94% | -3.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between UDI and FDL is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2022 | 0.84 |
The correlation between UDI and FDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
UDI vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UDI
FDL
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Technology
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
UDI
FDL
Healthcare
UDI
FDL
Energy
UDI
FDL
Real Estate
UDI
FDL
-
Utilities
UDI
FDL
Technology
UDI
FDL
Communication Services
UDI
FDL
Basic Materials
UDI
FDL
Consumer Defensive
UDI
FDL
Industrials
UDI
FDL
Consumer Cyclical
UDI
FDL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UDI vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
UDI
FDL
UDI vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund (UDI) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UDI | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.32 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 4.94 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.04 | 11.71 | +4.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UDI vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UDI drawdown since its inception was -14.17%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDI and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UDI | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.17% | -65.93% | +51.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.66% | -4.27% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.17% | -12.24% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -4.24% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -9.64% | +6.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.49% | 1.80% | -0.31% |
Volatility
UDI vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund (UDI) is 3.33%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that UDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UDI | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 3.52% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.17% | 8.03% | -0.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 11.51% | -1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 14.30% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.02% | 17.13% | -3.11% |
UDI vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UDI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
UDI vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
UDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than FDL's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.74% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
UDI USCF ESG Dividend Income Fund | 2.45% | 2.42% | 5.33% | 2.61% | 1.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UDI and FDL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDL has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to UDI (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDI dropped -14.17% vs FDL's -65.93%.
On 3-year performance, FDL leads with 18.63% vs 16.92% for UDI. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, UDI has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FDL has performed better with a 18.63% return vs 16.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UDI.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 2.45% for UDI.
They also come from different issuers: USCF Advisers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for UDI and 0.43% for FDL.
UDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UDI and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer