PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCO vs. YGLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UCO vs. YGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) and Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UCO vs. YGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UCO
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil
92.55%-29.75%4.40%
YGLD
Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF
1.68%96.82%-4.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCO achieves a 92.55% return, which is significantly higher than YGLD's 1.68% return.


UCO

1D
-5.34%
1M
34.20%
YTD
92.55%
6M
67.42%
1Y
37.47%
3Y*
12.01%
5Y*
21.35%
10Y*
-9.67%

YGLD

1D
3.01%
1M
-22.43%
YTD
1.68%
6M
12.73%
1Y
63.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UCO vs. YGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than YGLD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UCO vs. YGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCO
UCO Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

YGLD
YGLD Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
YGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
YGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
YGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
YGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCO vs. YGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) and Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UCOYGLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.66

1.47

-0.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

1.92

-0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.28

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.88

-0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.80

7.15

-5.34

UCO vs. YGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCO Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the YGLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCO and YGLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UCOYGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

1.47

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.36

1.60

-1.96

Correlation

The correlation between UCO and YGLD is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

UCO vs. YGLD - Dividend Comparison

UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.24%.


Drawdowns

UCO vs. YGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCO drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than YGLD's maximum drawdown of -34.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCO and YGLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UCOYGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.95%

-34.23%

-65.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.77%

-34.23%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.40%

-26.63%

-72.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.35%

-5.21%

-80.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.76%

9.01%

+11.75%

Volatility

UCO vs. YGLD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) at 14.93%. This indicates that UCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UCOYGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.64%

14.93%

+10.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.74%

37.02%

+3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.38%

43.73%

+13.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.11%

40.13%

+18.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.31%

40.13%

+31.18%