PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YGLD vs. GLDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YGLD vs. GLDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) and Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YGLD achieves a -7.24% return, which is significantly lower than GLDI's 2.06% return.


YGLD

1D
-1.34%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
-7.24%
6M
-7.14%
1Y
23.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDI

1D
-0.81%
1M
0.90%
YTD
2.06%
6M
4.42%
1Y
21.23%
3Y*
19.54%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
8.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YGLD vs. GLDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YGLD
Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF
-7.24%96.82%-4.17%
GLDI
Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN
2.06%34.25%0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between YGLD and GLDI is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024

0.79

The correlation between YGLD and GLDI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YGLD vs. GLDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YGLD
YGLD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
YGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
YGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
YGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
YGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDI
GLDI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
GLDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDI Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YGLD vs. GLDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) and Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YGLDGLDIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.30

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

1.55

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.55

6.07

-4.52

YGLD vs. GLDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YGLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the GLDI Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YGLD and GLDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YGLDGLDIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

1.46

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.37

+0.81

Drawdowns

YGLD vs. GLDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YGLD drawdown since its inception was -34.23%, which is greater than GLDI's maximum drawdown of -32.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YGLD and GLDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YGLDGLDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.23%

-32.26%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.23%

-13.73%

-20.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.06%

-7.37%

-25.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-14.00%

+6.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.86%

3.50%

+11.36%

Volatility

YGLD vs. GLDI - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN (GLDI) at 3.88%. This indicates that YGLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YGLDGLDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.70%

3.88%

+4.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.68%

12.87%

+21.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.43%

14.57%

+25.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.10%

11.31%

+27.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.10%

11.35%

+27.75%

YGLD vs. GLDI - Expense Ratio Comparison

YGLD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

YGLD vs. GLDI - Dividend Comparison

YGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.23%, less than GLDI's 22.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLDI
Credit Suisse X-Links Gold Shares Covered Call ETN
22.37%16.15%10.45%10.02%13.73%10.65%14.25%7.25%5.33%7.77%17.26%10.07%
YGLD
Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF
19.23%12.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YGLD and GLDI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YGLD has higher volatility (8.70%) compared to GLDI (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YGLD dropped -34.23% vs GLDI's -32.26%.

On 1-year performance, YGLD leads with 23.02% vs 21.23% for GLDI. On fees, YGLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GLDI has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YGLD has performed better with a 23.02% return vs 21.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YGLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GLDI.

GLDI has the higher dividend yield at 22.37%, compared with 19.23% for YGLD.

YGLD is categorized as Gold, while GLDI is Precious Metals. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for YGLD and 0.65% for GLDI.

GLDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YGLD and GLDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer