UCMCX vs. AOM
Compare and contrast key facts about USAA Cornerstone Moderately Conservative Fund (UCMCX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM).
UCMCX is managed by Victory. It was launched on Jun 7, 2012. AOM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Moderate. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Performance
UCMCX vs. AOM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UCMCX vs. AOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCMCX USAA Cornerstone Moderately Conservative Fund | 0.50% | 13.75% | 4.15% | 9.23% | -13.17% | 7.21% | 8.25% | 13.10% | -5.30% | 11.46% |
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | -0.40% | 13.28% | 7.95% | 12.38% | -14.54% | 6.93% | 10.02% | 15.58% | -3.88% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCMCX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than AOM's -0.40% return. Over the past 10 years, UCMCX has underperformed AOM with an annualized return of 4.96%, while AOM has yielded a comparatively higher 5.86% annualized return.
UCMCX
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- 12.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- 4.96%
AOM
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 11.52%
- 3Y*
- 9.29%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UCMCX vs. AOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCMCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than AOM's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UCMCX vs. AOM — Risk / Return Rank
UCMCX
AOM
UCMCX vs. AOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Cornerstone Moderately Conservative Fund (UCMCX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UCMCX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.58 | 1.40 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 2.03 | +0.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.19 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.47 | 8.80 | +0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UCMCX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.58 | 1.40 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.53 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.74 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.67 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between UCMCX and AOM is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UCMCX vs. AOM - Dividend Comparison
UCMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than AOM's 2.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCMCX USAA Cornerstone Moderately Conservative Fund | 3.32% | 3.16% | 2.03% | 2.42% | 7.62% | 6.62% | 1.68% | 2.31% | 4.13% | 4.37% | 2.39% | 3.31% |
AOM iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.99% | 2.98% | 3.10% | 2.79% | 2.27% | 1.56% | 2.02% | 2.66% | 2.53% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
UCMCX vs. AOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCMCX drawdown since its inception was -21.85%, which is greater than AOM's maximum drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCMCX and AOM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCMCX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.85% | -19.96% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.72% | -5.35% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.85% | -19.96% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.85% | -19.96% | -1.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.71% | -3.30% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -2.72% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.34% | 1.33% | +0.01% |
Volatility
UCMCX vs. AOM - Volatility Comparison
USAA Cornerstone Moderately Conservative Fund (UCMCX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) have volatilities of 3.36% and 3.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UCMCX | AOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 3.26% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.10% | 4.89% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.00% | 8.24% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.51% | 8.09% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.82% | 7.90% | -0.08% |