UCL vs. NUKZ
UCL (uCloudlink Group Inc.) is a stock, while NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Over the past year, UCL returned -66.29% vs 9.75% for NUKZ. Their 0.05 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
UCL vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCL achieves a -47.54% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 0.28% return.
UCL
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -9.55%
- 6M
- -43.77%
- YTD
- -47.54%
- 1Y
- -66.29%
- 3Y*
- -34.63%
- 5Y*
- -34.78%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -41.24%
NUKZ
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -4.27%
- 6M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 1Y
- 9.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 44.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.06M | $6.01M | $8.30M | |
| $4.31K | $4.15K | $14.80K |
UCL vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UCL uCloudlink Group Inc. | -47.54% | -21.90% | 44.83% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.28% | 56.57% | 60.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCL and NUKZ is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCL vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank
UCL
NUKZ
UCL vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCL | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.06 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 0.33 | -1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 0.80 | -1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCL vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCL drawdown since its inception was -97.82%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCL and NUKZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCL | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.82% | -33.03% | -64.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.38% | -20.29% | -58.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.18% | -16.46% | -79.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.45% | -6.44% | -76.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.72% | 8.42% | +49.30% |
Volatility
UCL vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison
uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) has a higher volatility of 10.45% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 9.21%. This indicates that UCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCL | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.45% | 9.21% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.26% | 23.79% | +14.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.44% | 31.03% | +38.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.07% | 32.74% | +75.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.12% | 32.74% | +71.38% |
Dividends
UCL vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison
UCL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.91% | 0.91% | 0.09% |
UCL uCloudlink Group Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UCL and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCL has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to NUKZ (9.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCL dropped -97.82% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.
NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCL and NUKZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer