UCL vs. NUKZ
UCL (uCloudlink Group Inc.) is a stock, while NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Over the past year, UCL returned -45.41% vs 32.85% for NUKZ. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UCL vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCL achieves a -38.41% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 11.95% return.
UCL
- 1D
- -4.90%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- -38.41%
- 6M
- -52.36%
- 1Y
- -45.41%
- 3Y*
- -31.63%
- 5Y*
- -37.76%
- 10Y*
- —
NUKZ
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 11.95%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 32.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UCL vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UCL uCloudlink Group Inc. | -38.41% | -21.90% | 44.83% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 11.95% | 56.57% | 60.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCL and NUKZ is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2024 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCL vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank
UCL
NUKZ
UCL vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCL | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.19 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.00 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 4.79 | -5.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCL vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCL drawdown since its inception was -97.82%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCL and NUKZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCL | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.82% | -33.03% | -64.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.00% | -16.51% | -59.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.51% | -6.74% | -88.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.21% | -6.07% | -76.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.77% | 6.88% | +44.89% |
Volatility
UCL vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison
uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) has a higher volatility of 22.72% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 10.68%. This indicates that UCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCL | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.72% | 10.68% | +12.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.93% | 23.04% | +19.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.17% | 30.54% | +46.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.47% | 32.87% | +75.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.92% | 32.87% | +72.05% |
Dividends
UCL vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison
UCL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NUKZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.81% | 0.91% | 0.09% |
UCL uCloudlink Group Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UCL and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCL has higher volatility (22.72%) compared to NUKZ (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCL dropped -97.82% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.
NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCL and NUKZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer