UCL vs. NLR
UCL (uCloudlink Group Inc.) is a stock, while NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF) is Uranium fund tracking the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. Over the past 5 years, UCL returned -34.78%/yr vs 18.29%/yr for NLR. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
UCL vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCL achieves a -47.54% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's -13.99% return.
UCL
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -9.55%
- 6M
- -43.77%
- YTD
- -47.54%
- 1Y
- -66.29%
- 3Y*
- -34.63%
- 5Y*
- -34.78%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -41.24%
NLR
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -28.16%
- YTD
- -13.99%
- 1Y
- -2.28%
- 3Y*
- 23.67%
- 5Y*
- 18.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $43.05M | $48.38M | $60.74M | |
| $4.31K | $4.15K | $14.80K |
UCL vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCL uCloudlink Group Inc. | -47.54% | -21.90% | 20.00% | -47.60% | -49.32% | -37.48% | -53.16% |
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | -13.99% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 13.63% | 9.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCL and NLR is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCL vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
UCL
NLR
UCL vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCL | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.02 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | -0.12 | -0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | -0.26 | -0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCL vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCL drawdown since its inception was -97.82%, which is greater than NLR's maximum drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCL and NLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCL | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.82% | -65.05% | -32.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.38% | -37.52% | -40.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.38% | -37.52% | -40.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.64% | -37.52% | -56.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.18% | -35.01% | -61.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.45% | -35.67% | -46.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.72% | 17.42% | +40.30% |
Volatility
UCL vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) is 10.45%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that UCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCL | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.45% | 12.90% | -2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.26% | 32.42% | +5.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.44% | 43.80% | +25.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.07% | 30.13% | +77.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.12% | 24.58% | +79.54% |
Dividends
UCL vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
UCL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLR VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF | 2.96% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
UCL uCloudlink Group Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UCL and NLR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NLR has higher volatility (12.90%) compared to UCL (10.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCL dropped -97.82% vs NLR's -65.05%.
NLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCL and NLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer