UCL vs. NVDA
UCL (uCloudlink Group Inc.) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. UCL operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 5 years, UCL returned -34.78%/yr vs 59.52%/yr for NVDA. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
UCL vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCL achieves a -47.54% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 7.77% return.
UCL
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- -9.55%
- 6M
- -43.77%
- YTD
- -47.54%
- 1Y
- -66.29%
- 3Y*
- -34.63%
- 5Y*
- -34.78%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -41.24%
NVDA
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 62.93%
- 5Y*
- 59.52%
- 10Y*
- 64.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 36.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.46B | $26.13B | $31.85B | |
| $4.31K | $4.15K | $14.80K |
UCL vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCL uCloudlink Group Inc. | -47.54% | -21.90% | 20.00% | -47.60% | -49.32% | -37.48% | -53.16% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 7.77% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 44.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCL and NVDA is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2020 | 0.11 |
The correlation between UCL and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UCL:
$32.70M
NVDA:
$4.86T
UCL:
$0.22
NVDA:
$6.53
UCL:
3.84
NVDA:
30.73
UCL:
0.01
NVDA:
0.17
UCL:
0.16
NVDA:
19.35
UCL:
0.13
NVDA:
25.05
UCL:
$79.66M
NVDA:
$253.49B
UCL:
$41.32M
NVDA:
$187.95B
UCL:
$9.87M
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCL vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
UCL
NVDA
UCL vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCL | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.09 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 0.65 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 1.32 | -2.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCL vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCL drawdown since its inception was -97.82%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCL and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCL | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.82% | -89.72% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.38% | -20.21% | -58.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.38% | -36.88% | -41.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.64% | -66.34% | -27.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.18% | -14.74% | -81.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.45% | -36.07% | -46.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.72% | 9.90% | +47.82% |
Volatility
UCL vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) is 10.45%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.04%. This indicates that UCL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCL | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.45% | 12.04% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.26% | 28.30% | +9.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.44% | 36.41% | +33.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.07% | 51.87% | +56.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.12% | 49.95% | +54.17% |
Dividends
UCL vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
UCL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
UCL uCloudlink Group Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
UCL vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between uCloudlink Group Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UCL vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
UCL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, uCloudlink Group Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.27M and revenue of 16.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
UCL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, uCloudlink Group Inc. reported an operating income of -2.67M and revenue of 16.86M, resulting in an operating margin of -15.9%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
UCL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, uCloudlink Group Inc. reported a net income of -3.49M and revenue of 16.86M, resulting in a net margin of -20.7%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UCL and NVDA have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDA has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to UCL (10.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCL dropped -97.82% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCL and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer