UCC vs. SQQQ
UCC (ProShares Ultra Consumer Services) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - UCC tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%) while SQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UCC returned 13.39%/yr vs -55.39%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.75, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UCC vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCC achieves a -8.35% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -41.78% return. Over the past 10 years, UCC has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 13.39%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.39% annualized return.
UCC
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -3.07%
- 6M
- -12.26%
- YTD
- -8.35%
- 1Y
- 5.17%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- -0.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
SQQQ
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 8.96%
- 6M
- -40.42%
- YTD
- -41.78%
- 1Y
- -56.67%
- 3Y*
- -52.19%
- 5Y*
- -46.41%
- 10Y*
- -55.39%
UCC vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | -8.35% | 2.21% | 44.24% | 61.67% | -57.59% | 20.92% | 46.55% | 53.76% | -4.94% | 42.05% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -41.78% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCC and SQQQ is -0.68, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.75 |
The correlation between UCC and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.81 (5 years) to -0.68 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCC vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
UCC
SQQQ
UCC vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCC | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.82 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | -0.93 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.45 | -1.71 | +2.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCC vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCC drawdown since its inception was -83.05%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCC and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCC | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.05% | -100.00% | +16.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -61.03% | +31.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.01% | -92.51% | +44.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.77% | -97.27% | +35.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.77% | -99.97% | +38.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.17% | -100.00% | +81.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.78% | -92.76% | +70.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.42% | 33.18% | -21.76% |
Volatility
UCC vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) is 12.15%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 24.13%. This indicates that UCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCC | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.15% | 24.13% | -11.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.41% | 45.92% | -17.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.29% | 55.62% | -18.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.00% | 67.88% | -23.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.75% | 66.56% | -25.81% |
UCC vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UCC and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UCC vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
UCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than SQQQ's 10.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 10.26% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | 1.26% | 1.10% | 0.17% | 0.04% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UCC and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (24.13%) compared to UCC (12.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCC dropped -83.05% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, UCC leads with 13.39% vs -55.39% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UCC has been the lower-risk option at 12.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UCC has performed better with a 13.39% return vs -55.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UCC and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 1.26% for UCC.
UCC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).
UCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCC and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer