UCC vs. ENFR
UCC (ProShares Ultra Consumer Services) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UCC is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%), while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UCC returned 14.23%/yr vs 11.81%/yr for ENFR. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.
Performance
UCC vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCC achieves a -10.76% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 23.07% return. Over the past 10 years, UCC has outperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 14.23%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.81% annualized return.
UCC
- 1D
- -3.37%
- 1M
- -7.19%
- YTD
- -10.76%
- 6M
- -15.05%
- 1Y
- 10.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.60%
- 5Y*
- -1.20%
- 10Y*
- 14.23%
ENFR
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -5.94%
- YTD
- 23.07%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 24.84%
- 3Y*
- 28.26%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
UCC vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | -10.76% | 2.21% | 44.24% | 61.67% | -57.59% | 20.92% | 46.55% | 53.76% | -4.94% | 42.05% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.07% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCC and ENFR is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013 | 0.36 |
The correlation between UCC and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCC vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
UCC
ENFR
UCC vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCC | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.29 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 2.89 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.02 | 7.40 | -6.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCC vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCC drawdown since its inception was -83.05%, which is greater than ENFR's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCC and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCC | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.05% | -68.28% | -14.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -8.64% | -20.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.01% | -15.58% | -32.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.77% | -20.29% | -41.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.77% | -62.64% | +0.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.32% | -6.12% | -14.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.79% | -15.94% | -5.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.66% | 3.36% | +7.30% |
Volatility
UCC vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) has a higher volatility of 13.04% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.42%. This indicates that UCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCC | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.04% | 5.42% | +7.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.94% | 11.57% | +16.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.01% | 14.82% | +22.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.85% | 19.24% | +24.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.77% | 24.68% | +16.09% |
UCC vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
UCC vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
UCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than ENFR's 4.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.08% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | 1.21% | 1.10% | 0.17% | 0.04% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UCC and ENFR have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UCC has higher volatility (13.04%) compared to ENFR (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCC dropped -83.05% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
On 10-year performance, UCC leads with 14.23% vs 11.81% for ENFR. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UCC has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 11.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCC.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 1.21% for UCC.
UCC is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. UCC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%), while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UCC and 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCC and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer