UC15.L vs. DBJP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UC15.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UC15.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI, while DBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UC15.L returned 9.68%/yr vs 16.87%/yr for DBJP. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UC15.L charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBJP.

Performance

UC15.L vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

UC15.L is traded in GBp, while DBJP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DBJP values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UC15.L achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly higher than DBJP's 17.84% return. Over the past 10 years, UC15.L has underperformed DBJP with an annualized return of 9.68%, while DBJP has yielded a comparatively higher 16.87% annualized return.

UC15.L

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 21.49%
• 6M: 20.94%
• 1Y: 31.35%
• 3Y*: 10.32%
• 5Y*: 12.77%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

DBJP

• 1D: -2.89%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 17.84%
• 6M: 18.29%
• 1Y: 52.19%
• 3Y*: 24.00%
• 5Y*: 22.11%
• 10Y*: 16.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UC15.L vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	21.49%	2.57%	6.44%	-6.52%	29.97%	36.11%	-2.49%	5.31%	-5.25%	-2.80%
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	17.84%	20.28%	27.72%	29.40%	7.21%	14.11%	7.29%	16.27%	-9.77%	10.75%

Correlation

The correlation between UC15.L and DBJP is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013	0.24

Over the past year, the correlation between UC15.L and DBJP has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UC15.L vs. DBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UC15.L	DBJP
Technology	31.0%	19.1%
Communication Services	15.0%	7.9%
Energy	14.2%	1.1%
Financial Services	10.9%	17.5%
Healthcare	9.8%	6.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.3%	12.2%
Industrials	6.6%	26.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	3.6%
Utilities	1.1%	1.1%
Basic Materials	0.5%	3.0%
Real Estate	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

UC15.L vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UC15.L

UC15.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
UC15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
UC15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
UC15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
UC15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UC15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 75

DBJP

DBJP Risk / Return Rank: 84
DBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
DBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
DBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 81
DBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UC15.L vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UC15.L	DBJP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.83	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	3.68	-0.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.50	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.23	5.81	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.93	21.83	-7.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UC15.L vs. DBJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UC15.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the DBJP Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UC15.L and DBJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UC15.L	DBJP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	2.83	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	1.16	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66	0.83	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.71	-0.38

Drawdowns

UC15.L vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UC15.L drawdown since its inception was -42.93%, which is greater than DBJP's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC15.L and DBJP.

Drawdown Indicators

	UC15.L	DBJP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.93%	-27.70%	-15.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.18%	-9.03%	+2.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.98%	-21.07%	+7.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.43%	-21.07%	+3.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.26%	-27.70%	-2.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.53%	-2.89%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.17%	-6.54%	-8.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	2.40%	-0.08%

Volatility

UC15.L vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) at 4.20%. This indicates that UC15.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UC15.L	DBJP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	4.20%	+0.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.34%	13.44%	-1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.26%	18.56%	-3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.69%	19.21%	-4.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.80%	20.31%	-5.51%

UC15.L vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

UC15.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

UC15.L vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison

UC15.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF	2.41%	2.81%	2.80%	5.21%	0.80%	2.30%	2.53%	2.56%	3.87%	2.07%	1.13%	5.95%
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UC15.L and DBJP in my portfolio?

UC15.L and DBJP have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UC15.L or DBJP?

On fees, UC15.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UC15.L or DBJP?

UC15.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DBJP.

What is the main difference between UC15.L and DBJP?

UC15.L is categorized as Commodities, while DBJP is Japan Equities. UC15.L tracks UBS CMCI, while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for UC15.L and 0.45% for DBJP.