UC15.L vs. GDIG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) and VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L).
UC15.L and GDIG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UC15.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the UBS CMCI. It was launched on Dec 20, 2010. GDIG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Mining Reduced Coal Index. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. Both UC15.L and GDIG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UC15.L vs. GDIG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UC15.L vs. GDIG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 16.32% | 2.57% | 6.44% | -6.52% | 29.97% | 36.11% | -2.49% | 5.31% | -4.41% |
GDIG.L VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF | 17.93% | 77.01% | -7.08% | -0.65% | 15.96% | 8.15% | 27.51% | 20.58% | -6.44% |
Different Trading Currencies
UC15.L is traded in GBp, while GDIG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GDIG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC15.L achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly lower than GDIG.L's 17.93% return.
UC15.L
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 21.05%
- 1Y
- 16.42%
- 3Y*
- 7.30%
- 5Y*
- 14.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.31%
GDIG.L
- 1D
- 6.35%
- 1M
- -10.75%
- YTD
- 17.93%
- 6M
- 36.73%
- 1Y
- 93.90%
- 3Y*
- 24.02%
- 5Y*
- 18.52%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UC15.L vs. GDIG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UC15.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than GDIG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UC15.L vs. GDIG.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC15.L
GDIG.L
UC15.L vs. GDIG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) and VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UC15.L | GDIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 2.87 | -1.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 3.25 | -1.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.46 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 4.15 | -1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.32 | 18.13 | -11.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UC15.L | GDIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 2.87 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 0.66 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.62 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between UC15.L and GDIG.L is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UC15.L vs. GDIG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UC15.L nor GDIG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UC15.L vs. GDIG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC15.L drawdown since its inception was -42.93%, which is greater than GDIG.L's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC15.L and GDIG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC15.L | GDIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.93% | -40.03% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -24.08% | +15.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.43% | -40.03% | +22.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | -12.40% | +9.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.34% | -12.75% | -2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 5.93% | -3.29% |
Volatility
UC15.L vs. GDIG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) is 6.90%, while VanEck S&P Global Mining UCITS ETF (GDIG.L) has a volatility of 15.38%. This indicates that UC15.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDIG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UC15.L | GDIG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 15.38% | -8.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 28.32% | -17.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.43% | 32.52% | -18.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 28.16% | -13.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.72% | 27.49% | -12.77% |