UC15.L vs. SGLN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L).
UC15.L and SGLN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UC15.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the UBS CMCI. It was launched on Dec 20, 2010. SGLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. Both UC15.L and SGLN.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UC15.L vs. SGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UC15.L vs. SGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC15.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 16.32% | 2.57% | 6.44% | -6.52% | 29.97% | 36.11% | -2.49% | 5.31% | -5.25% | -2.80% |
SGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 12.05% | 53.66% | 28.20% | 7.24% | 11.84% | -2.57% | 19.62% | 14.63% | 4.36% | 1.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UC15.L achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly higher than SGLN.L's 12.05% return. Over the past 10 years, UC15.L has underperformed SGLN.L with an annualized return of 10.31%, while SGLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 15.23% annualized return.
UC15.L
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- 6.87%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 6M
- 21.05%
- 1Y
- 16.42%
- 3Y*
- 7.30%
- 5Y*
- 14.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.31%
SGLN.L
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- -9.41%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 25.13%
- 1Y
- 48.12%
- 3Y*
- 30.78%
- 5Y*
- 23.47%
- 10Y*
- 15.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UC15.L vs. SGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
UC15.L vs. SGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
UC15.L
SGLN.L
UC15.L vs. SGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UC15.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 1.96 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 2.41 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.37 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 2.77 | -0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.32 | 11.39 | -5.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UC15.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.96 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | 1.45 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.96 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.59 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between UC15.L and SGLN.L is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UC15.L vs. SGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither UC15.L nor SGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UC15.L vs. SGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UC15.L drawdown since its inception was -42.93%, roughly equal to the maximum SGLN.L drawdown of -41.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UC15.L and SGLN.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UC15.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.93% | -41.71% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -17.57% | +8.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.43% | -17.57% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.26% | -21.91% | -8.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | -9.41% | +6.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.34% | -14.78% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 4.27% | -1.63% |
Volatility
UC15.L vs. SGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (UC15.L) is 6.90%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (SGLN.L) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that UC15.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UC15.L | SGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 11.66% | -4.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 21.22% | -10.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.43% | 24.48% | -10.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 16.15% | -1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.72% | 15.75% | -1.03% |