PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBVSX vs. VFH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBVSX vs. VFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I (UBVSX) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBVSX achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly higher than VFH's 5.30% return. Over the past 10 years, UBVSX has underperformed VFH with an annualized return of 10.56%, while VFH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.43% annualized return.


UBVSX

1D
-1.88%
1M
0.43%
6M
9.87%
YTD
14.85%
1Y
20.66%
3Y*
11.26%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
10.56%
ALL TIME*
9.79%

VFH

1D
-0.14%
1M
2.24%
6M
7.40%
YTD
5.30%
1Y
13.18%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
13.43%
ALL TIME*
6.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$53.46M$73.54M$73.23M

UBVSX vs. VFH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBVSX
JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I
14.85%1.70%13.03%14.59%-1.26%34.05%3.35%23.11%-15.37%13.26%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
5.30%14.91%30.44%14.17%-12.31%35.22%-1.96%31.57%-13.52%19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between UBVSX and VFH is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.84

The correlation between UBVSX and VFH shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBVSX vs. VFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UBVSX
UBVSX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
UBVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
UBVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VFH
VFH Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VFH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFH Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VFH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFH Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UBVSX vs. VFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I (UBVSX) and Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBVSXVFHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.14

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

0.74

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

1.93

+2.93

UBVSX vs. VFH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBVSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the VFH Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBVSX and VFH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBVSX vs. VFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBVSX drawdown since its inception was -52.19%, smaller than the maximum VFH drawdown of -78.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBVSX and VFH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBVSXVFHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.19%

-78.61%

+26.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-14.75%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.48%

-17.30%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.48%

-25.66%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.19%

-44.42%

-7.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-1.21%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-18.42%

+12.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

5.67%

-2.05%

Volatility

UBVSX vs. VFH - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I (UBVSX) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) at 4.07%. This indicates that UBVSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBVSXVFHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

4.07%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

11.21%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.63%

15.06%

+1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.11%

19.12%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.56%

22.48%

+2.08%

UBVSX vs. VFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBVSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VFH's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBVSX vs. VFH - Dividend Comparison

UBVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, more than VFH's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UBVSX
JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I
8.15%9.35%7.36%8.30%8.89%3.34%0.90%4.85%11.46%4.53%3.11%3.69%
VFH
Vanguard Financials ETF
1.67%1.55%1.75%2.08%2.31%1.87%2.21%2.17%2.30%1.53%1.63%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBVSX and VFH have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBVSX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to VFH (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBVSX dropped -52.19% vs VFH's -78.61%.

UBVSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBVSX and VFH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer