UBVSX vs. FCPVX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

UBVSX (JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I) and FCPVX (Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, UBVSX returned 9.84%/yr vs 10.89%/yr for FCPVX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

UBVSX vs. FCPVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I (UBVSX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBVSX achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly lower than FCPVX's 16.85% return. Over the past 10 years, UBVSX has underperformed FCPVX with an annualized return of 9.84%, while FCPVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.89% annualized return.

UBVSX

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 6.90%
• 6M: 8.80%
• 1Y: 15.75%
• 3Y*: 12.54%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: 9.84%

FCPVX

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 16.85%
• 6M: 16.40%
• 1Y: 34.76%
• 3Y*: 16.56%
• 5Y*: 7.78%
• 10Y*: 10.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBVSX vs. FCPVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UBVSX JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I	6.90%	1.70%	13.03%	14.59%	-1.26%	34.05%	3.35%	23.11%	-15.37%	13.26%
FCPVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund	16.85%	8.13%	9.41%	17.77%	-13.07%	38.08%	11.18%	20.86%	-15.47%	12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between UBVSX and FCPVX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.94

The correlation between UBVSX and FCPVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UBVSX vs. FCPVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBVSX

UBVSX Risk / Return Rank: 12
UBVSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
UBVSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
UBVSX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
UBVSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
UBVSX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

FCPVX

FCPVX Risk / Return Rank: 50
FCPVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
FCPVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FCPVX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FCPVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FCPVX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBVSX vs. FCPVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I (UBVSX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UBVSX	FCPVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.91	-1.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	2.86	-1.40
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.33	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	3.22	-1.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.75	11.25	-7.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UBVSX vs. FCPVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBVSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the FCPVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBVSX and FCPVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UBVSX	FCPVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	1.91	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.37	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40	0.49	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.46	-0.06

Drawdowns

UBVSX vs. FCPVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBVSX drawdown since its inception was -52.19%, smaller than the maximum FCPVX drawdown of -57.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBVSX and FCPVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	UBVSX	FCPVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.19%	-57.65%	+5.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.36%	-10.31%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.48%	-23.81%	+2.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.48%	-23.81%	+2.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.19%	-44.59%	-7.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.63%	-2.42%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.28%	-7.97%	+1.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.72%	2.95%	+0.77%

Volatility

UBVSX vs. FCPVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I (UBVSX) is 4.30%, while Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that UBVSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UBVSX	FCPVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.30%	5.76%	-1.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.75%	12.60%	-1.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.73%	17.80%	-1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.33%	20.94%	-0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.61%	22.35%	+2.26%

UBVSX vs. FCPVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UBVSX and FCPVX have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

UBVSX vs. FCPVX - Dividend Comparison

UBVSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.75%, which matches FCPVX's 8.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCPVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund	8.69%	10.15%	6.13%	5.20%	5.92%	7.95%	0.46%	3.49%	36.44%	3.64%	7.12%	11.09%
UBVSX JPMorgan Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund Class I	8.75%	9.35%	7.36%	8.30%	8.89%	3.34%	0.90%	4.85%	11.46%	4.53%	3.11%	3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UBVSX and FCPVX in my portfolio?

UBVSX and FCPVX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UBVSX or FCPVX?

FCPVX has higher volatility (5.76%) compared to UBVSX (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBVSX dropped -52.19% vs FCPVX's -57.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCPVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.