UBT vs. TSYW
UBT (ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury) and TSYW (Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF) are both Leveraged Bonds funds. UBT is passively managed, while TSYW is actively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. UBT charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSYW.
Performance
UBT vs. TSYW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBT achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than TSYW's -2.14% return.
UBT
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 6M
- -6.59%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- -10.32%
- 5Y*
- -17.99%
- 10Y*
- -8.27%
TSYW
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- -2.14%
- 6M
- -4.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UBT vs. TSYW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UBT ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury | -2.69% | -4.06% |
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF | -2.14% | -2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBT and TSYW is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBT vs. TSYW — Risk / Return Rank
UBT
TSYW
UBT vs. TSYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury (UBT) and Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBT | TSYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBT | TSYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | -0.78 | +0.80 |
Drawdowns
UBT vs. TSYW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBT drawdown since its inception was -78.90%, which is greater than TSYW's maximum drawdown of -9.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBT and TSYW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBT | TSYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.90% | -9.79% | -69.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.66% | -6.51% | -70.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.30% | -3.99% | -28.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.01% | — | — |
Volatility
UBT vs. TSYW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBT | TSYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.41% | 10.78% | +8.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.33% | 10.78% | +20.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.31% | 10.78% | +18.53% |
UBT vs. TSYW - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSYW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBT vs. TSYW - Dividend Comparison
UBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, less than TSYW's 7.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF | 7.44% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UBT ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury | 3.99% | 4.26% | 4.50% | 3.54% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.26% | 1.50% | 1.55% | 1.37% | 0.75% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, UBT and TSYW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, UBT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UBT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSYW.
TSYW has the higher dividend yield at 7.44%, compared with 3.99% for UBT.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UBT and 0.99% for TSYW.
Find the right allocation for UBT and TSYW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer