TSYW vs. TTT
TSYW (Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF) and TTT (UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury) are both Leveraged Bonds funds. TSYW is actively managed, while TTT is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.97, they often move in opposite directions. TSYW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TTT.
Performance
TSYW vs. TTT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYW achieves a -2.14% return, which is significantly lower than TTT's 3.59% return.
TSYW
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- -2.14%
- 6M
- -4.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TTT
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- 3.59%
- 6M
- 10.09%
- 1Y
- -6.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- 17.30%
- 10Y*
- -1.20%
TSYW vs. TTT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF | -2.14% | -2.56% |
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury | 3.59% | 7.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYW and TTT is -0.97, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025 | -0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYW vs. TTT — Risk / Return Rank
TSYW
TTT
TSYW vs. TTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW) and UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSYW | TTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.78 | -0.23 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
TSYW vs. TTT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYW drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum TTT drawdown of -94.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYW and TTT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYW | TTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -94.00% | +84.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -22.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.51% | -78.28% | +71.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -70.36% | +66.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.13% | — |
Volatility
TSYW vs. TTT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYW | TTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.78% | 29.26% | -18.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 47.18% | -36.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.78% | 43.38% | -32.60% |
TSYW vs. TTT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TTT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYW vs. TTT - Dividend Comparison
TSYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, less than TTT's 9.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF | 7.44% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TTT UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury | 9.34% | 9.87% | 4.86% | 12.15% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.29% | 1.88% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSYW and TTT have a correlation of -0.97, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TTT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TTT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSYW.
TTT has the higher dividend yield at 9.34%, compared with 7.44% for TSYW.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for TSYW and 0.95% for TTT.
Find the right allocation for TSYW and TTT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer