UBR vs. QLD
UBR (ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - UBR tracks the MSCI Brazil Index (200%) while QLD tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UBR returned -1.90%/yr vs 36.10%/yr for QLD. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UBR vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBR achieves a 13.03% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 42.06% return. Over the past 10 years, UBR has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of -1.90%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 36.10% annualized return.
UBR
- 1D
- -5.40%
- 1M
- -21.46%
- YTD
- 13.03%
- 6M
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 56.81%
- 3Y*
- 8.90%
- 5Y*
- -5.17%
- 10Y*
- -1.90%
QLD
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 21.54%
- YTD
- 42.06%
- 6M
- 37.45%
- 1Y
- 85.49%
- 3Y*
- 50.15%
- 5Y*
- 25.75%
- 10Y*
- 36.10%
UBR vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBR ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil | 13.03% | 96.11% | -57.05% | 49.98% | 5.60% | -39.03% | -60.67% | 44.19% | -19.11% | 35.36% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 42.06% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBR and QLD is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2010 | 0.42 |
The correlation between UBR and QLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (5 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBR vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
UBR
QLD
UBR vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil (UBR) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBR | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 2.70 | -1.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 3.16 | -1.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.41 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 3.42 | -1.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | 11.92 | -6.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBR | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 2.70 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 | 0.58 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 | 0.81 | -0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.20 | 0.60 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
UBR vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBR drawdown since its inception was -97.15%, which is greater than QLD's maximum drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBR and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBR | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.15% | -83.13% | -14.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.50% | -25.13% | -6.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.11% | -42.29% | -15.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.07% | -63.68% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.57% | -63.68% | -23.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.84% | -0.53% | -92.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -77.90% | -18.17% | -59.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.63% | 7.20% | +3.43% |
Volatility
UBR vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil (UBR) has a higher volatility of 15.51% compared to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) at 8.90%. This indicates that UBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBR | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.51% | 8.90% | +6.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.58% | 24.08% | +17.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.62% | 31.85% | +17.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.66% | 44.74% | +10.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.68% | 44.56% | +22.12% |
UBR vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UBR and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UBR vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
UBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than QLD's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
UBR ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil | 1.85% | 2.05% | 8.09% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.53% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBR and QLD have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UBR has higher volatility (15.51%) compared to QLD (8.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBR dropped -97.15% vs QLD's -83.13%.
On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 36.10% vs -1.90% for UBR. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 36.10% return vs -1.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UBR and QLD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.
UBR tracks MSCI Brazil Index (200%), while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%).
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UBR and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer