PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBR vs. FLBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBR vs. FLBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil (UBR) and Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBR achieves a 25.33% return, which is significantly higher than FLBR's 21.58% return.


UBR

1D
0.70%
1M
12.25%
6M
-6.59%
YTD
25.33%
1Y
81.94%
3Y*
5.62%
5Y*
0.83%
10Y*
-4.03%
ALL TIME*
-12.17%

FLBR

1D
0.88%
1M
6.92%
6M
3.21%
YTD
21.58%
1Y
46.09%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.25M$2.48M$4.17M
$50.41K$42.73K$85.45K

UBR vs. FLBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBR
ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil
25.33%96.11%-57.05%49.98%5.60%-39.03%-60.67%44.19%-19.11%7.18%
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
21.58%45.57%-27.58%33.19%10.44%-16.78%-20.13%28.47%-2.13%2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between UBR and FLBR is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.97

The correlation between UBR and FLBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBR vs. FLBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UBR
UBR Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
UBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBR Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
UBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBR Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FLBR
FLBR Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FLBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLBR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FLBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLBR Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UBR vs. FLBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil (UBR) and Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBRFLBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.33

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

2.57

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.45

6.14

-0.69

UBR vs. FLBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBR Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the FLBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBR and FLBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBR vs. FLBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBR drawdown since its inception was -97.15%, which is greater than FLBR's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBR and FLBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBRFLBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.15%

-57.42%

-39.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.75%

-18.38%

-17.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.11%

-28.97%

-29.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.23%

-32.31%

-32.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.06%

-11.13%

-80.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-78.03%

-18.55%

-59.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.35%

7.68%

+7.67%

Volatility

UBR vs. FLBR - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil (UBR) has a higher volatility of 11.69% compared to Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF (FLBR) at 6.42%. This indicates that UBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBRFLBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.69%

6.42%

+5.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.29%

19.42%

+18.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.70%

25.26%

+24.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.14%

27.46%

+27.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.24%

32.89%

+33.35%

UBR vs. FLBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FLBR's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBR vs. FLBR - Dividend Comparison

UBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than FLBR's 5.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLBR
Franklin FTSE Brazil ETF
5.66%7.71%7.68%8.84%11.99%8.71%2.32%3.42%3.72%0.42%
UBR
ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil
1.57%2.05%8.09%1.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.53%0.13%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, UBR and FLBR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UBR has higher volatility (11.69%) compared to FLBR (6.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBR dropped -97.15% vs FLBR's -57.42%.

On 5-year performance, FLBR leads with 8.65% vs 0.83% for UBR. On fees, FLBR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FLBR has been the lower-risk option at 6.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLBR has performed better with a 8.65% return vs 0.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLBR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UBR.

FLBR has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 1.57% for UBR.

UBR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FLBR is Latin America Equities. UBR tracks MSCI Brazil Index (200%), while FLBR tracks FTSE Brazil RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UBR and 0.19% for FLBR.

FLBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBR and FLBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer