PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEP vs. ZIM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

IEP vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEP achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly lower than ZIM's 23.05% return.


IEP

1D
-0.96%
1M
-4.37%
YTD
8.54%
6M
11.19%
1Y
10.33%
3Y*
-20.40%
5Y*
-19.53%
10Y*
-4.09%

ZIM

1D
3.82%
1M
0.12%
YTD
23.05%
6M
31.40%
1Y
61.18%
3Y*
52.37%
5Y*
18.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEP vs. ZIM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IEP
Icahn Enterprises L.P.
8.54%8.23%-37.79%-58.78%18.76%2.51%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
23.05%28.11%176.93%-21.06%-52.70%463.11%

Correlation

The correlation between IEP and ZIM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021

0.17

Fundamentals

EPS

IEP:

-$1.15

ZIM:

$0.81

PS Ratio

IEP:

0.30

ZIM:

0.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

IEP:

$10.18B

ZIM:

$6.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

IEP:

$1.33B

ZIM:

$676.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

IEP:

$1.17B

ZIM:

$1.73B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEP vs. ZIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEP
IEP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEP Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIM
ZIM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ZIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEP vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEPZIMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.26

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

2.06

-1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

5.18

-3.81

IEP vs. ZIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEP Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the ZIM Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEP and ZIM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEP vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEP drawdown since its inception was -84.21%, roughly equal to the maximum ZIM drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEP and ZIM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEPZIMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.21%

-84.68%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.06%

-29.84%

+13.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.83%

-57.12%

-10.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.56%

-84.68%

+7.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-72.18%

-11.49%

-60.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.62%

-39.77%

+9.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.56%

11.85%

-4.29%

Volatility

IEP vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Icahn Enterprises L.P. (IEP) is 4.81%, while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a volatility of 11.94%. This indicates that IEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEPZIMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

11.94%

-7.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.07%

36.70%

-20.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.12%

52.54%

-27.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.02%

65.74%

-24.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.36%

67.49%

-31.13%

Dividends

IEP vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison

IEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.70%, more than ZIM's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEP
Icahn Enterprises L.P.
27.70%26.49%40.37%34.90%15.79%16.13%15.79%13.01%12.26%11.32%10.01%9.79%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
4.95%20.16%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

IEP vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Icahn Enterprises L.P. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B4.00B4.50B20222023202420252026
2.31B
1.40B
(IEP) Total Revenue
(ZIM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

IEP vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Icahn Enterprises L.P. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
3.4%
Portfolio components
IEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Icahn Enterprises L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 46.80M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.4%.

IEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Icahn Enterprises L.P. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of -39.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.

IEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Icahn Enterprises L.P. reported a net income of -612.00M and revenue of 2.31B, resulting in a net margin of -26.5%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


IEP and ZIM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZIM has higher volatility (11.94%) compared to IEP (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEP dropped -84.21% vs ZIM's -84.68%.

ZIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEP and ZIM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer