UAMY vs. AMDL
UAMY (United States Antimony Corporation) is a stock, while AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Over the past year, UAMY returned 244.36% vs 1189.78% for AMDL. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UAMY vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAMY achieves a 82.47% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 395.18% return.
UAMY
- 1D
- -10.11%
- 1M
- -22.04%
- YTD
- 82.47%
- 6M
- 72.18%
- 1Y
- 244.36%
- 3Y*
- 203.89%
- 5Y*
- 57.05%
- 10Y*
- 45.20%
AMDL
- 1D
- 8.25%
- 1M
- 135.69%
- YTD
- 395.18%
- 6M
- 371.52%
- 1Y
- 1,189.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UAMY vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UAMY United States Antimony Corporation | 82.47% | 183.62% | 580.77% |
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 395.18% | 103.00% | -69.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between UAMY and AMDL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UAMY vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank
UAMY
AMDL
UAMY vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UAMY | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.63 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 21.43 | -18.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.78 | 42.08 | -36.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UAMY | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.86 | 9.30 | -7.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.56 | -0.49 |
Drawdowns
UAMY vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAMY drawdown since its inception was -96.44%, which is greater than AMDL's maximum drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAMY and AMDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UAMY | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.44% | -88.63% | -7.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -74.30% | -56.13% | -18.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.57% | 0.00% | -47.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.43% | -48.58% | -17.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.51% | 28.53% | +13.98% |
Volatility
UAMY vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) is 32.49%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 46.02%. This indicates that UAMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UAMY | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.49% | 46.02% | -13.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.81% | 94.09% | -1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 132.11% | 129.41% | +2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.88% | 116.59% | -21.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 101.04% | 116.59% | -15.55% |
Dividends
UAMY vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison
Neither UAMY nor AMDL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UAMY and AMDL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMDL has higher volatility (46.02%) compared to UAMY (32.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAMY dropped -96.44% vs AMDL's -88.63%.
AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.30 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UAMY and AMDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer