TZA vs. TMF
TZA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TZA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TZA returned -42.58%/yr vs -18.47%/yr for TMF. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TZA charges 1.11%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
TZA vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TZA achieves a -43.24% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -16.67% return. Over the past 10 years, TZA has underperformed TMF with an annualized return of -42.58%, while TMF has yielded a comparatively higher -18.47% annualized return.
TZA
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- 6M
- -33.61%
- YTD
- -43.24%
- 1Y
- -63.97%
- 3Y*
- -40.66%
- 5Y*
- -31.37%
- 10Y*
- -42.58%
- ALL TIME*
- -49.66%
TMF
- 1D
- -2.08%
- 1M
- -12.05%
- 6M
- -15.79%
- YTD
- -16.67%
- 1Y
- -18.44%
- 3Y*
- -20.63%
- 5Y*
- -34.74%
- 10Y*
- -18.47%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $161.82M | $130.43M | $127.82M | |
| $153.79M | $463.04M | $1.03B |
TZA vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | -43.24% | -40.22% | -32.22% | -41.19% | 30.21% | -50.80% | -80.43% | -53.25% | 25.06% | -38.19% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -16.67% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between TZA and TMF is -0.26, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2009 | 0.22 |
The correlation between TZA and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TZA vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
TZA
TMF
TZA vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TZA | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.93 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | -0.53 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | -1.07 | -0.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TZA vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TZA drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than TMF's maximum drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TZA and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TZA | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -93.10% | -6.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.34% | -28.69% | -38.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.50% | -50.64% | -38.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.74% | -89.14% | -2.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.67% | -93.10% | -6.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -93.10% | -6.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -44.07% | -53.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.18% | 14.10% | +32.08% |
Volatility
TZA vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) has a higher volatility of 11.25% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 7.21%. This indicates that TZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TZA | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.25% | 7.21% | +4.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.35% | 19.98% | +22.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.73% | 27.35% | +30.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.27% | 46.36% | +20.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.83% | 43.70% | +25.13% |
TZA vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TZA has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
TZA vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
TZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than TMF's 4.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.74% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | 4.67% | 5.08% | 5.40% | 5.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.21% | 1.56% | 0.63% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TZA and TMF have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TZA has higher volatility (11.25%) compared to TMF (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TZA dropped -100.00% vs TMF's -93.10%.
On 10-year performance, TMF leads with -18.47% vs -42.58% for TZA. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TMF has performed better with a -18.47% return vs -42.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMF is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for TZA.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 4.67% for TZA.
TZA is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. TZA tracks Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.11% for TZA and 1.01% for TMF.
TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.55 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TZA and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer