TZA vs. TECS
TZA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares) and TECS (Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - TZA tracks the Russell 2000 Index (-300%) while TECS tracks the Technology Select Sector Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TZA returned -44.17%/yr vs -62.40%/yr for TECS. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TZA charges 1.11%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for TECS.
Performance
TZA vs. TECS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TZA achieves a -46.35% return, which is significantly higher than TECS's -60.06% return. Over the past 10 years, TZA has outperformed TECS with an annualized return of -44.17%, while TECS has yielded a comparatively lower -62.40% annualized return.
TZA
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -12.69%
- YTD
- -46.35%
- 6M
- -42.28%
- 1Y
- -67.58%
- 3Y*
- -46.88%
- 5Y*
- -30.52%
- 10Y*
- -44.17%
TECS
- 1D
- 11.54%
- 1M
- -13.82%
- YTD
- -60.06%
- 6M
- -58.34%
- 1Y
- -76.73%
- 3Y*
- -62.98%
- 5Y*
- -57.09%
- 10Y*
- -62.40%
TZA vs. TECS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | -46.35% | -40.22% | -32.22% | -41.19% | 30.21% | -50.80% | -80.43% | -53.25% | 25.06% | -38.19% |
TECS Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares | -60.06% | -62.44% | -49.76% | -74.45% | 45.05% | -67.92% | -87.79% | -73.77% | -19.14% | -60.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between TZA and TECS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2008 | 0.72 |
The correlation between TZA and TECS shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TZA vs. TECS — Risk / Return Rank
TZA
TECS
TZA vs. TECS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) and Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares (TECS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TZA | TECS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.75 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -0.98 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.56 | -1.86 | +0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TZA vs. TECS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TZA drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum TECS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TZA and TECS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TZA | TECS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -100.00% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.07% | -78.66% | +10.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.28% | -96.22% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.56% | -98.82% | +7.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.74% | -100.00% | +0.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -100.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.99% | -96.76% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.46% | 43.87% | -0.41% |
Volatility
TZA vs. TECS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) is 19.17%, while Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares (TECS) has a volatility of 36.37%. This indicates that TZA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TECS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TZA | TECS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.17% | 36.37% | -17.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.84% | 58.81% | -15.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.62% | 70.17% | -11.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.66% | 75.65% | -7.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.98% | 72.84% | -3.86% |
TZA vs. TECS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TZA has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than TECS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
TZA vs. TECS - Dividend Comparison
TZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, less than TECS's 9.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TECS Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares | 9.75% | 5.83% | 5.24% | 7.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.50% | 2.40% | 0.72% |
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | 5.35% | 5.08% | 5.40% | 5.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.21% | 1.56% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TZA and TECS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TECS has higher volatility (36.37%) compared to TZA (19.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TZA dropped -100.00% vs TECS's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, TZA leads with -44.17% vs -62.40% for TECS. On fees, TECS is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, TZA has been the lower-risk option at 19.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TZA has performed better with a -44.17% return vs -62.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TECS is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for TZA.
TECS has the higher dividend yield at 9.75%, compared with 5.35% for TZA.
TZA tracks Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while TECS tracks Technology Select Sector Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.11% for TZA and 1.08% for TECS.
TECS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.10 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TZA and TECS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer