PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TYGO vs. KEN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TYGO vs. KEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tigo Energy Inc. (TYGO) and Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYGO achieves a 107.97% return, which is significantly higher than KEN's 14.26% return.


TYGO

1D
-2.05%
1M
-27.34%
YTD
107.97%
6M
81.65%
1Y
145.30%
3Y*
-43.32%
5Y*
10Y*

KEN

1D
0.54%
1M
-17.72%
YTD
14.26%
6M
23.62%
1Y
118.60%
3Y*
57.99%
5Y*
31.84%
10Y*
41.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TYGO vs. KEN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TYGO
Tigo Energy Inc.
107.97%40.12%-52.88%-79.51%3.03%3.02%
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
14.26%126.18%62.44%-19.16%-23.73%31.78%

Correlation

The correlation between TYGO and KEN is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2021

0.13

The correlation between TYGO and KEN shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TYGO:

$208.30M

KEN:

$3.84B

EPS

TYGO:

$0.05

KEN:

$1.54

PE Ratio

TYGO:

57.20

KEN:

46.98

PS Ratio

TYGO:

1.75

KEN:

3.80

PB Ratio

TYGO:

5.10

KEN:

2.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

TYGO:

$109.89M

KEN:

$1.01B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TYGO:

$47.97M

KEN:

$166.82M

EBITDA (TTM)

TYGO:

$12.07M

KEN:

$339.95M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TYGO vs. KEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYGO
TYGO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TYGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYGO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TYGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYGO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

KEN
KEN Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
KEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEN Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
KEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEN Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYGO vs. KEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tigo Energy Inc. (TYGO) and Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TYGOKENDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.44

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

4.42

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

17.27

-11.02

TYGO vs. KEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the KEN Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYGO and KEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TYGO vs. KEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYGO drawdown since its inception was -97.45%, which is greater than KEN's maximum drawdown of -69.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYGO and KEN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TYGOKENDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.45%

-69.20%

-28.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.64%

-26.41%

-23.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.45%

-32.27%

-65.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.07%

-24.16%

-64.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.49%

-23.19%

-32.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.42%

6.74%

+14.68%

Volatility

TYGO vs. KEN - Volatility Comparison

Tigo Energy Inc. (TYGO) has a higher volatility of 17.85% compared to Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) at 14.84%. This indicates that TYGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TYGOKENDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.85%

14.84%

+3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.62%

30.71%

+46.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

101.13%

39.55%

+61.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

92.03%

39.79%

+52.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

92.03%

41.93%

+50.10%

Dividends

TYGO vs. KEN - Dividend Comparison

TYGO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
5.31%7.24%11.18%11.46%25.00%7.35%7.41%5.75%96.34%0.00%0.00%45.52%
TYGO
Tigo Energy Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TYGO vs. KEN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tigo Energy Inc. and Kenon Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
25.20M
317.00M
(TYGO) Total Revenue
(KEN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TYGO vs. KEN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tigo Energy Inc. and Kenon Holdings Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-80.0%-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
42.8%
14.8%
Portfolio components
TYGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tigo Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.79M and revenue of 25.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.8%.

KEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.00M and revenue of 317.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.

TYGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tigo Energy Inc. reported an operating income of -2.41M and revenue of 25.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -9.6%.

KEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

TYGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tigo Energy Inc. reported a net income of -1.75M and revenue of 25.20M, resulting in a net margin of -7.0%.

KEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 26.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TYGO and KEN have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TYGO has higher volatility (17.85%) compared to KEN (14.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYGO dropped -97.45% vs KEN's -69.20%.

KEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TYGO and KEN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer