KEN vs. TRIN
KEN (Kenon Holdings Ltd.) and TRIN (Trinity Capital Inc.) are both stocks. KEN operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while TRIN operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, KEN returned 31.24%/yr vs 20.06%/yr for TRIN. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KEN vs. TRIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KEN achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than TRIN's 28.98% return.
KEN
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 6.24%
- 1Y
- 50.59%
- 3Y*
- 54.12%
- 5Y*
- 31.24%
- 10Y*
- 38.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 29.41%
TRIN
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- YTD
- 28.98%
- 1Y
- 35.54%
- 3Y*
- 22.53%
- 5Y*
- 20.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.44M | $1.46M | $2.07M | |
| $16.13M | $17.31M | $18.09M |
KEN vs. TRIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 6.24% | 126.18% | 62.44% | -19.16% | -23.73% | 110.45% |
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc. | 28.98% | 16.01% | 14.83% | 53.97% | -26.60% | 36.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between KEN and TRIN is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
KEN:
$3.51B
TRIN:
$1.31B
KEN:
$1.52
TRIN:
$1.99
KEN:
44.42
TRIN:
8.82
KEN:
3.59
TRIN:
4.92
KEN:
2.38
TRIN:
1.26
KEN:
$1.01B
TRIN:
$276.05M
KEN:
$166.82M
TRIN:
$219.75M
KEN:
$339.95M
TRIN:
$195.35M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KEN vs. TRIN — Risk / Return Rank
KEN
TRIN
KEN vs. TRIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KEN | TRIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.29 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 2.33 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.99 | 5.84 | -1.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KEN vs. TRIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KEN drawdown since its inception was -69.20%, which is greater than TRIN's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEN and TRIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KEN | TRIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.20% | -43.12% | -26.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.19% | -14.99% | -18.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.19% | -15.58% | -17.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.20% | -43.12% | -26.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.49% | -2.12% | -27.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.26% | -8.73% | -14.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.14% | 5.98% | +6.16% |
Volatility
KEN vs. TRIN - Volatility Comparison
Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) has a higher volatility of 12.02% compared to Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) at 4.71%. This indicates that KEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KEN | TRIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.02% | 4.71% | +7.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.11% | 15.13% | +16.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.31% | 20.39% | +19.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.88% | 26.64% | +13.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.92% | 26.76% | +15.16% |
Dividends
KEN vs. TRIN - Dividend Comparison
KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, less than TRIN's 12.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd. | 5.71% | 7.24% | 11.18% | 11.46% | 25.00% | 7.35% | 7.41% | 5.75% | 96.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 45.52% |
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc. | 12.59% | 13.92% | 14.10% | 14.04% | 21.32% | 7.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
KEN vs. TRIN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kenon Holdings Ltd. and Trinity Capital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KEN vs. TRIN - Profitability Comparison
KEN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 47.00M and revenue of 317.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.
TRIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trinity Capital Inc. reported a gross profit of 66.05M and revenue of 83.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.3%.
KEN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
TRIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trinity Capital Inc. reported an operating income of 61.68M and revenue of 83.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 74.0%.
KEN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kenon Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 26.00M and revenue of 317.00M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.
TRIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Trinity Capital Inc. reported a net income of 45.52M and revenue of 83.32M, resulting in a net margin of 54.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KEN and TRIN have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEN has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to TRIN (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KEN dropped -69.20% vs TRIN's -43.12%.
TRIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KEN and TRIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer