PortfoliosLab logo
KEN vs. TRIN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between KEN and TRIN is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

KEN vs. TRIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KEN:

1.81

TRIN:

0.55

Sortino Ratio

KEN:

2.43

TRIN:

0.98

Omega Ratio

KEN:

1.31

TRIN:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

KEN:

1.27

TRIN:

0.85

Martin Ratio

KEN:

11.67

TRIN:

2.65

Ulcer Index

KEN:

5.30%

TRIN:

4.99%

Daily Std Dev

KEN:

34.40%

TRIN:

21.55%

Max Drawdown

KEN:

-66.55%

TRIN:

-43.12%

Current Drawdown

KEN:

-10.31%

TRIN:

-9.71%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KEN:

$1.85B

TRIN:

$935.50M

EPS

KEN:

$0.38

TRIN:

$2.23

PE Ratio

KEN:

93.26

TRIN:

6.49

PEG Ratio

KEN:

0.00

TRIN:

5.26

PS Ratio

KEN:

2.43

TRIN:

3.90

PB Ratio

KEN:

1.15

TRIN:

1.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

KEN:

$736.61M

TRIN:

$233.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KEN:

$127.57M

TRIN:

$200.95M

EBITDA (TTM)

KEN:

$273.18M

TRIN:

$198.43M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEN achieves a 20.89% return, which is significantly higher than TRIN's 3.33% return.


KEN

YTD

20.89%

1M

14.07%

6M

35.69%

1Y

61.69%

3Y*

3.85%

5Y*

30.97%

10Y*

23.41%

TRIN

YTD

3.33%

1M

0.98%

6M

7.24%

1Y

11.72%

3Y*

11.73%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Kenon Holdings Ltd.

Trinity Capital Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

KEN vs. TRIN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KEN is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KEN is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KEN is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KEN is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KEN is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KEN is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

TRIN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TRIN is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TRIN is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TRIN is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TRIN is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TRIN is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TRIN is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KEN vs. TRIN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current KEN Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the TRIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEN and TRIN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

KEN vs. TRIN - Dividend Comparison

KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.54%, less than TRIN's 14.10% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
KEN
Kenon Holdings Ltd.
13.54%11.18%11.46%41.67%7.35%7.41%5.75%96.34%
TRIN
Trinity Capital Inc.
14.10%14.10%14.04%21.32%7.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

KEN vs. TRIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEN drawdown since its inception was -66.55%, which is greater than TRIN's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEN and TRIN.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

KEN vs. TRIN - Volatility Comparison

Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) has a higher volatility of 8.01% compared to Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) at 5.93%. This indicates that KEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

KEN vs. TRIN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kenon Holdings Ltd. and Trinity Capital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20212022202320242025
159.30M
62.67M
(KEN) Total Revenue
(TRIN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items