KEN vs. TRIN

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN).

Performance

KEN vs. TRIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KEN vs. TRIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd.	28.80%	126.18%	62.44%	-19.16%	-23.73%	112.20%
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc.	4.35%	16.01%	14.83%	53.97%	-26.60%	27.12%

Fundamentals

Market Cap KEN : $4.75B TRIN : $1.14B
EPS KEN : $9.03 TRIN : $1.91
PE Ratio KEN : 9.46 TRIN : 7.73
PS Ratio KEN : 5.61 TRIN : 3.78
PB Ratio KEN : 3.17 TRIN : 1.04
Total Revenue (TTM) KEN : $803.30M TRIN : $279.97M
Gross Profit (TTM) KEN : $145.79M TRIN : $228.11M
EBITDA (TTM) KEN : $162.42M TRIN : $98.03M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KEN achieves a 28.80% return, which is significantly higher than TRIN's 4.35% return.

KEN

• 1D: 3.70%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 28.80%
• 6M: 89.09%
• 1Y: 209.54%
• 3Y*: 62.54%
• 5Y*: 40.34%
• 10Y*: 46.37%

TRIN

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 4.35%
• 6M: 4.11%
• 1Y: 9.31%
• 3Y*: 21.04%
• 5Y*: 15.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KEN vs. TRIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KEN

KEN Risk / Return Rank: 99
KEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
KEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
KEN Omega Ratio Rank: 98
KEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
KEN Martin Ratio Rank: 99

TRIN

TRIN Risk / Return Rank: 53
TRIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
TRIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
TRIN Omega Ratio Rank: 46
TRIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
TRIN Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KEN vs. TRIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) and Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KEN	TRIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	5.68	0.41	+5.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.27	0.71	+4.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	1.09	+0.64
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	13.42	0.79	+12.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	40.22	1.75	+38.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KEN vs. TRIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KEN Sharpe Ratio is 5.68, which is higher than the TRIN Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KEN and TRIN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KEN	TRIN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.68	0.41	+5.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	0.58	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.53	+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between KEN and TRIN is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KEN vs. TRIN - Dividend Comparison

KEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, less than TRIN's 13.79% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KEN Kenon Holdings Ltd.	5.62%	7.24%	11.18%	11.46%	25.00%	7.35%	7.41%	5.75%	96.34%	0.00%	0.00%	45.52%
TRIN Trinity Capital Inc.	13.79%	13.92%	14.10%	14.04%	21.32%	7.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

KEN vs. TRIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KEN drawdown since its inception was -69.20%, which is greater than TRIN's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KEN and TRIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	KEN	TRIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.20%	-43.12%	-26.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.63%	-14.99%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-69.20%	-43.12%	-26.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-11.33%	+9.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.47%	-9.13%	-14.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.22%	6.75%	-1.53%

Volatility

KEN vs. TRIN - Volatility Comparison

Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) has a higher volatility of 11.77% compared to Trinity Capital Inc. (TRIN) at 6.09%. This indicates that KEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KEN	TRIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.77%	6.09%	+5.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.43%	15.75%	+9.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.16%	22.67%	+14.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.22%	26.33%	+12.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.17%	26.94%	+15.23%

Financials