PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWGGX vs. EFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWGGX vs. EFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Focused Global Growth Fund (TWGGX) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWGGX achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly lower than EFA's 8.42% return. Over the past 10 years, TWGGX has outperformed EFA with an annualized return of 11.72%, while EFA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.11% annualized return.


TWGGX

1D
0.41%
1M
5.12%
YTD
6.50%
6M
6.66%
1Y
13.04%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
5.93%
10Y*
11.72%

EFA

1D
-0.86%
1M
3.40%
YTD
8.42%
6M
10.94%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
9.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWGGX vs. EFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWGGX
American Century Focused Global Growth Fund
6.50%16.50%13.99%18.49%-22.76%13.83%27.88%36.20%-6.32%27.49%
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
8.42%31.55%3.49%18.36%-14.39%11.45%7.60%22.04%-13.82%25.07%

Correlation

The correlation between TWGGX and EFA is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2001

0.88

The correlation between TWGGX and EFA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWGGX vs. EFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWGGX
TWGGX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TWGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TWGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

EFA
EFA Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWGGX vs. EFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Global Growth Fund (TWGGX) and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TWGGXEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.26

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

1.85

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.85

6.94

-3.09

TWGGX vs. EFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWGGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the EFA Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWGGX and EFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TWGGXEFADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

1.41

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.51

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.53

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.31

+0.17

Drawdowns

TWGGX vs. EFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWGGX drawdown since its inception was -58.08%, roughly equal to the maximum EFA drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWGGX and EFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWGGXEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.08%

-61.04%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-11.42%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.80%

-14.05%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.23%

-29.53%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.06%

-34.19%

+2.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.46%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-11.93%

-3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

3.04%

+0.36%

Volatility

TWGGX vs. EFA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Focused Global Growth Fund (TWGGX) is 4.43%, while iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that TWGGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWGGXEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

4.98%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

12.51%

-0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

15.05%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.30%

16.48%

+1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.71%

17.26%

+1.45%

TWGGX vs. EFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWGGX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than EFA's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWGGX vs. EFA - Dividend Comparison

TWGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%, more than EFA's 3.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
3.12%3.38%3.24%2.98%2.69%3.33%2.13%3.10%3.39%2.57%3.07%2.76%
TWGGX
American Century Focused Global Growth Fund
8.47%9.02%14.90%3.81%12.67%13.16%11.05%17.27%11.31%12.90%0.58%8.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


TWGGX and EFA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFA has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to TWGGX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWGGX dropped -58.08% vs EFA's -61.04%.

EFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWGGX and EFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer