PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWGGX vs. ACFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWGGX vs. ACFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Focused Global Growth Fund (TWGGX) and American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWGGX achieves a 6.68% return, which is significantly higher than ACFOX's 3.87% return. Over the past 10 years, TWGGX has underperformed ACFOX with an annualized return of 12.43%, while ACFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.36% annualized return.


TWGGX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.85%
YTD
6.68%
6M
5.75%
1Y
13.72%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
5.69%
10Y*
12.43%

ACFOX

1D
-1.92%
1M
-3.93%
YTD
3.87%
6M
1.69%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
25.25%
5Y*
8.89%
10Y*
19.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWGGX vs. ACFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWGGX
American Century Focused Global Growth Fund
6.68%16.50%13.99%18.49%-22.76%13.83%27.88%36.20%-6.32%27.49%
ACFOX
American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund
3.87%20.51%43.30%35.66%-36.32%7.08%73.31%32.30%6.51%34.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TWGGX and ACFOX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2006

0.86

The correlation between TWGGX and ACFOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWGGX vs. ACFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWGGX
TWGGX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TWGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TWGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

ACFOX
ACFOX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ACFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ACFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWGGX vs. ACFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Focused Global Growth Fund (TWGGX) and American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TWGGXACFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.24

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

1.65

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.35

5.63

-1.29

TWGGX vs. ACFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWGGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the ACFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWGGX and ACFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TWGGX vs. ACFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWGGX drawdown since its inception was -58.08%, roughly equal to the maximum ACFOX drawdown of -58.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWGGX and ACFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWGGXACFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.08%

-58.92%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-16.52%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.80%

-27.03%

+9.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.23%

-43.77%

+12.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.06%

-43.77%

+11.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.96%

+5.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.03%

-14.68%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

4.82%

-1.38%

Volatility

TWGGX vs. ACFOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Focused Global Growth Fund (TWGGX) is 6.48%, while American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that TWGGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWGGXACFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.48%

7.93%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

16.14%

-2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.61%

20.10%

-4.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.49%

25.46%

-6.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.77%

23.92%

-5.15%

TWGGX vs. ACFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWGGX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than ACFOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWGGX vs. ACFOX - Dividend Comparison

TWGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.46%, more than ACFOX's 7.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACFOX
American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund
7.27%7.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.48%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.15%1.33%
TWGGX
American Century Focused Global Growth Fund
8.46%9.02%14.90%3.81%12.67%13.16%11.05%17.27%11.31%12.90%0.58%8.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


TWGGX and ACFOX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACFOX has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to TWGGX (6.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWGGX dropped -58.08% vs ACFOX's -58.92%.

ACFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWGGX and ACFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer