TUSA vs. SIZE
TUSA (First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF) and SIZE (iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - TUSA tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index while SIZE tracks the MSCI USA Low Size Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TUSA returned 10.75%/yr vs 11.76%/yr for SIZE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TUSA charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SIZE.
Performance
TUSA vs. SIZE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUSA achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly lower than SIZE's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, TUSA has underperformed SIZE with an annualized return of 10.75%, while SIZE has yielded a comparatively higher 11.76% annualized return.
TUSA
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -2.16%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 6.72%
- 1Y
- 18.40%
- 3Y*
- 16.04%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
SIZE
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 8.29%
- 1Y
- 18.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.76%
TUSA vs. SIZE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF | 6.54% | 13.64% | 11.12% | 11.75% | -13.54% | 24.79% | 14.16% | 24.29% | -10.35% | 20.07% |
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF | 9.07% | 10.51% | 14.37% | 17.78% | -15.86% | 25.05% | 16.26% | 28.97% | -6.59% | 18.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUSA and SIZE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2013 | 0.70 |
The correlation between TUSA and SIZE shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TUSA vs. SIZE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TUSA
SIZE
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Financial Services
TUSA
SIZE
Industrials
TUSA
SIZE
Consumer Cyclical
TUSA
SIZE
Basic Materials
TUSA
SIZE
Utilities
TUSA
SIZE
Technology
TUSA
SIZE
Consumer Defensive
TUSA
SIZE
Real Estate
TUSA
SIZE
Healthcare
TUSA
SIZE
Communication Services
TUSA
SIZE
Energy
TUSA
SIZE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUSA vs. SIZE — Risk / Return Rank
TUSA
SIZE
TUSA vs. SIZE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TUSA | SIZE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.44 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.19 | 2.12 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.28 | +0.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | 8.88 | -1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TUSA | SIZE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.47 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.63 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.68 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
TUSA vs. SIZE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUSA drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, which is greater than SIZE's maximum drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSA and SIZE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUSA | SIZE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.53% | -39.15% | -17.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -7.97% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | -18.71% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.35% | -24.03% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | -39.15% | -3.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.46% | -0.68% | -3.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.87% | -4.18% | -5.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.04% | +0.40% |
Volatility
TUSA vs. SIZE - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) at 3.17%. This indicates that TUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIZE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUSA | SIZE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 3.17% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 9.54% | -0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.92% | 12.73% | +0.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.65% | 17.39% | +0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 18.69% | +1.45% |
TUSA vs. SIZE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUSA has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SIZE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUSA vs. SIZE - Dividend Comparison
TUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than SIZE's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF | 1.42% | 1.50% | 1.53% | 1.42% | 1.59% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.35% | 2.43% | 1.58% | 1.88% | 1.95% |
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF | 1.66% | 1.59% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 2.31% | 0.72% | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.14% | 0.79% | 1.24% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUSA and SIZE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUSA has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to SIZE (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSA dropped -56.53% vs SIZE's -39.15%.
On 10-year performance, SIZE leads with 11.76% vs 10.75% for TUSA. On fees, SIZE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SIZE has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SIZE has performed better with a 11.76% return vs 10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIZE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.
TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.42% for SIZE.
TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index, while SIZE tracks MSCI USA Low Size Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TUSA and 0.15% for SIZE.
TUSA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUSA and SIZE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer