SIZE vs. VOO
SIZE (iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIZE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Low Size Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SIZE returned 12.00%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SIZE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
SIZE vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIZE achieves a 8.82% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SIZE has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 12.00%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.61% annualized return.
SIZE
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 17.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
VOO
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
SIZE vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF | 8.82% | 10.51% | 14.37% | 17.78% | -15.86% | 25.05% | 16.26% | 28.97% | -6.59% | 18.76% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.19% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIZE and VOO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.84 |
The correlation between SIZE and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SIZE vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIZE
VOO
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Technology
SIZE
VOO
Industrials
SIZE
VOO
Financial Services
SIZE
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
SIZE
VOO
Healthcare
SIZE
VOO
Utilities
SIZE
VOO
Consumer Defensive
SIZE
VOO
Real Estate
SIZE
VOO
Basic Materials
SIZE
VOO
Communication Services
SIZE
VOO
Energy
SIZE
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIZE vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
SIZE
VOO
SIZE vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIZE | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.35 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 2.67 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.33 | 11.96 | -3.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIZE vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIZE drawdown since its inception was -39.15%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIZE and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIZE | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.15% | -33.99% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.97% | -8.90% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.71% | -18.69% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -24.52% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.15% | -33.99% | -5.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -3.14% | +1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -3.68% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 1.99% | +0.07% |
Volatility
SIZE vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) is 3.87%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.83%. This indicates that SIZE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIZE | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 4.83% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 9.82% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.98% | 12.46% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 16.91% | +0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 18.02% | +0.68% |
SIZE vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIZE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SIZE vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
SIZE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIZE iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF | 1.40% | 1.50% | 1.53% | 1.42% | 1.59% | 1.19% | 1.43% | 1.35% | 2.43% | 1.58% | 1.88% | 1.95% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIZE and VOO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to SIZE (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIZE dropped -39.15% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.61% vs 12.00% for SIZE. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SIZE has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.61% return vs 12.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SIZE.
SIZE has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.
SIZE is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. SIZE tracks MSCI USA Low Size Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SIZE and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIZE and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer