TUSA vs. IMCB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TUSA (First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF) and IMCB (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - TUSA tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index while IMCB tracks the IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TUSA returned 10.75%/yr vs 11.32%/yr for IMCB. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TUSA charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IMCB.

Performance

TUSA vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUSA achieves a 6.54% return, which is significantly lower than IMCB's 14.72% return. Over the past 10 years, TUSA has underperformed IMCB with an annualized return of 10.75%, while IMCB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.32% annualized return.

TUSA

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -2.16%
• YTD: 6.54%
• 6M: 6.72%
• 1Y: 18.40%
• 3Y*: 16.04%
• 5Y*: 6.32%
• 10Y*: 10.75%

IMCB

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 5.22%
• YTD: 14.72%
• 6M: 14.61%
• 1Y: 23.24%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 8.81%
• 10Y*: 11.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUSA vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF	6.54%	13.64%	11.12%	11.75%	-13.54%	24.79%	14.16%	24.29%	-10.35%	20.07%
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	14.72%	10.25%	15.10%	16.37%	-16.09%	22.81%	13.35%	31.49%	-11.53%	19.70%

Correlation

The correlation between TUSA and IMCB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2004	0.67

The correlation between TUSA and IMCB shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TUSA vs. IMCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TUSA	IMCB
Financial Services	31.9%	12.0%
Industrials	19.8%	19.0%
Consumer Cyclical	16.0%	9.0%
Basic Materials	14.1%	5.3%
Utilities	7.5%	6.2%
Technology	6.1%	21.3%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	5.1%
Real Estate	2.1%	4.3%
Healthcare	2.0%	7.9%
Communication Services	2.0%	2.3%
Energy	1.9%	7.4%

Return for Risk

TUSA vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUSA

TUSA Risk / Return Rank: 45
TUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
TUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
TUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 39
TUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
TUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 46

IMCB

IMCB Risk / Return Rank: 56
IMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
IMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
IMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 51
IMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
IMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUSA vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TUSA	IMCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.83	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.61	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.32	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	2.90	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.56	11.50	-3.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TUSA vs. IMCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the IMCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUSA and IMCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TUSA	IMCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.44	1.83	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.50	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.58	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	0.50	-0.19

Drawdowns

TUSA vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUSA drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, roughly equal to the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSA and IMCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	TUSA	IMCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.53%	-58.80%	+2.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.57%	-8.05%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.04%	-19.80%	+1.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.35%	-25.15%	+1.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.47%	-40.99%	-1.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.46%	-0.24%	-4.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.87%	-7.73%	-2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	2.03%	+0.41%

Volatility

TUSA vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) at 3.31%. This indicates that TUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TUSA	IMCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	3.31%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.87%	9.58%	-0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.92%	12.75%	+0.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.65%	17.57%	+0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.14%	19.65%	+0.49%

TUSA vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUSA has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

TUSA vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison

TUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than IMCB's 1.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	1.21%	1.42%	1.43%	1.55%	1.70%	1.08%	1.12%	1.32%	1.80%	1.31%	1.79%	1.47%
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF	1.66%	1.59%	2.05%	2.15%	2.31%	0.72%	0.99%	1.13%	1.14%	0.79%	1.24%	0.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TUSA and IMCB in my portfolio?

TUSA and IMCB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TUSA or IMCB?

TUSA has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to IMCB (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSA dropped -56.53% vs IMCB's -58.80%.

Which ETF is better, TUSA or IMCB?

On 10-year performance, IMCB leads with 11.32% vs 10.75% for TUSA. On fees, IMCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IMCB has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TUSA or IMCB?

Over the 10-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 11.32% return vs 10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TUSA or IMCB?

IMCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TUSA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TUSA or IMCB?

TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 1.21% for IMCB.

What is the main difference between TUSA and IMCB?

TUSA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Total US Market Index, while IMCB tracks IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TUSA and 0.04% for IMCB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IMCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.