TUSA vs. GRNJ
TUSA (First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF) and GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. TUSA is passively managed, while GRNJ is actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TUSA charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRNJ.
Performance
TUSA vs. GRNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUSA achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than GRNJ's 21.37% return.
TUSA
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
GRNJ
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 21.37%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TUSA vs. GRNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF | 8.91% | 4.90% |
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 21.37% | 6.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUSA and GRNJ is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUSA vs. GRNJ — Risk / Return Rank
TUSA
GRNJ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TUSA vs. GRNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF (TUSA) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TUSA | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.28 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TUSA vs. GRNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUSA drawdown since its inception was -56.53%, which is greater than GRNJ's maximum drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSA and GRNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUSA | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.53% | -17.32% | -39.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -4.88% | +2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.85% | -4.10% | -5.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | — | — |
Volatility
TUSA vs. GRNJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUSA | GRNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 30.68% | -17.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 30.68% | -13.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 30.68% | -10.56% |
TUSA vs. GRNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUSA has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNJ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUSA vs. GRNJ - Dividend Comparison
TUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, while GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TUSA First Trust Total US Market AlphaDEX ETF | 1.94% | 1.59% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 2.31% | 0.72% | 0.99% | 1.13% | 1.14% | 0.79% | 1.24% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUSA and GRNJ have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TUSA is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TUSA is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.
TUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fundstrat. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TUSA and 0.75% for GRNJ.
Find the right allocation for TUSA and GRNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer