PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUGN vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUGN vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUGN achieves a 19.35% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 13.43% return.


TUGN

1D
-0.29%
1M
11.07%
YTD
19.35%
6M
17.92%
1Y
36.99%
3Y*
22.84%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQI

1D
-0.17%
1M
6.91%
YTD
13.43%
6M
12.92%
1Y
30.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUGN vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TUGN
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
19.35%19.11%14.36%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.43%18.62%19.83%

Correlation

The correlation between TUGN and QQQI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024

0.95

The correlation between TUGN and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

TUGN vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TUGN
QQQI

Technology

53.8%
53.3%

Communication Services

15.6%
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

11.8%
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
7.7%

Healthcare

4.3%
4.3%

Industrials

3.2%
3.3%

Utilities

1.3%
1.5%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.2%

Energy

0.7%
0.7%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.3%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

TUGN
53.8%
QQQI
53.3%

Communication Services

TUGN
15.6%
QQQI
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

TUGN
11.8%
QQQI
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

TUGN
7.9%
QQQI
7.7%

Healthcare

TUGN
4.3%
QQQI
4.3%

Industrials

TUGN
3.2%
QQQI
3.3%

Utilities

TUGN
1.3%
QQQI
1.5%

Basic Materials

TUGN
1.2%
QQQI
1.2%

Energy

TUGN
0.7%
QQQI
0.7%

Financial Services

TUGN
0.2%
QQQI
0.3%

Real Estate

TUGN
0.1%
QQQI
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUGN vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUGN
TUGN Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
TUGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUGN Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TUGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUGN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUGN vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUGNQQQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.43

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

3.18

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.00

14.27

-4.28

TUGN vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUGN Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUGN and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUGNQQQIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.35

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

1.34

-0.37

Drawdowns

TUGN vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUGN drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUGN and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUGNQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-20.00%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.96%

-9.61%

-3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.17%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-2.20%

-4.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

2.14%

+1.57%

Volatility

TUGN vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 2.68%. This indicates that TUGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUGNQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

2.68%

+2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

9.85%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.25%

12.98%

+2.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

17.07%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

17.07%

-0.04%

TUGN vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUGN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

TUGN vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

TUGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.50%, less than QQQI's 13.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.19%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%
TUGN
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
10.50%11.50%11.84%10.83%7.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, TUGN and QQQI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TUGN has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to QQQI (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUGN dropped -23.45% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

On 1-year performance, TUGN leads with 36.99% vs 30.41% for QQQI. On fees, TUGN is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TUGN has performed better with a 36.99% return vs 30.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TUGN is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.19%, compared with 10.50% for TUGN.

TUGN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: STF and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TUGN and 0.68% for QQQI.

TUGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUGN and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer