TUGN vs. QQQI
TUGN (STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TUGN is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by STF, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TUGN returned 36.99% vs 30.41% for QQQI. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TUGN charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.
Performance
TUGN vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUGN achieves a 19.35% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 13.43% return.
TUGN
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 11.07%
- YTD
- 19.35%
- 6M
- 17.92%
- 1Y
- 36.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 6.91%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 12.92%
- 1Y
- 30.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TUGN vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF | 19.35% | 19.11% | 14.36% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.43% | 18.62% | 19.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUGN and QQQI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between TUGN and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
TUGN vs. QQQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TUGN
QQQI
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
TUGN
QQQI
Communication Services
TUGN
QQQI
Consumer Cyclical
TUGN
QQQI
Consumer Defensive
TUGN
QQQI
Healthcare
TUGN
QQQI
Industrials
TUGN
QQQI
Utilities
TUGN
QQQI
Basic Materials
TUGN
QQQI
Energy
TUGN
QQQI
Financial Services
TUGN
QQQI
Real Estate
TUGN
QQQI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUGN vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank
TUGN
QQQI
TUGN vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TUGN | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.43 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 3.18 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | 14.27 | -4.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TUGN | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 2.35 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 1.34 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
TUGN vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUGN drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUGN and QQQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUGN | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.45% | -20.00% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.96% | -9.61% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.17% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -2.20% | -4.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 2.14% | +1.57% |
Volatility
TUGN vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 2.68%. This indicates that TUGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUGN | QQQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 2.68% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.63% | 9.85% | +1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.25% | 12.98% | +2.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 17.07% | -0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 17.07% | -0.04% |
TUGN vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUGN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUGN vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison
TUGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.50%, less than QQQI's 13.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.19% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF | 10.50% | 11.50% | 11.84% | 10.83% | 7.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, TUGN and QQQI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TUGN has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to QQQI (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUGN dropped -23.45% vs QQQI's -20.00%.
On 1-year performance, TUGN leads with 36.99% vs 30.41% for QQQI. On fees, TUGN is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TUGN has performed better with a 36.99% return vs 30.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TUGN is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.
QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.19%, compared with 10.50% for TUGN.
TUGN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: STF and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TUGN and 0.68% for QQQI.
TUGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUGN and QQQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer