TUGN vs. QQQI

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

TUGN (STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF) and QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TUGN is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by STF, while QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TUGN returned 26.56% vs 22.62% for QQQI. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TUGN charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQI.

Performance

TUGN vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUGN achieves a 16.88% return, which is significantly higher than QQQI's 11.31% return.

TUGN

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -1.73%
• 6M: 16.69%
• YTD: 16.88%
• 1Y: 26.56%
• 3Y*: 20.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQI

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -1.95%
• 6M: 10.51%
• YTD: 11.31%
• 1Y: 22.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUGN vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF	16.88%	19.11%	13.44%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	11.31%	18.62%	19.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TUGN and QQQI is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.95

The correlation between TUGN and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TUGN vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUGN

TUGN Risk / Return Rank: 53
TUGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
TUGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
TUGN Omega Ratio Rank: 56
TUGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
TUGN Martin Ratio Rank: 50

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 57
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUGN vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TUGN	QQQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.47	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	2.00	+0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.27	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	2.36	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.89	9.74	-2.85

TUGN vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUGN Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUGN and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TUGN vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUGN drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than QQQI's maximum drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUGN and QQQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	TUGN	QQQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.45%	-20.00%	-3.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.96%	-9.61%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.36%	-2.04%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.33%	-2.21%	-4.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	2.33%	+1.53%

Volatility

TUGN vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) have volatilities of 6.81% and 6.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TUGN	QQQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.81%	6.91%	-0.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.26%	12.78%	+1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.24%	15.44%	+1.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.35%	17.58%	-0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	17.58%	-0.23%

TUGN vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUGN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

TUGN vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

TUGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%, less than QQQI's 13.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.65%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF	10.95%	11.50%	11.84%	10.83%	7.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TUGN and QQQI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, TUGN and QQQI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TUGN or QQQI?

QQQI has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to TUGN (6.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUGN dropped -23.45% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

Which ETF is better, TUGN or QQQI?

On 1-year performance, TUGN leads with 26.56% vs 22.62% for QQQI. On fees, TUGN is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, TUGN has been the lower-risk option at 6.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TUGN or QQQI?

Over the 1-year period, TUGN has performed better with a 26.56% return vs 22.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TUGN or QQQI?

TUGN is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TUGN or QQQI?

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.65%, compared with 10.95% for TUGN.

What is the main difference between TUGN and QQQI?

TUGN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: STF and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TUGN and 0.68% for QQQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TUGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.