PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUGN vs. JEPQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUGN vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUGN achieves a 15.79% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 7.85% return.


TUGN

1D
-1.93%
1M
0.55%
YTD
15.79%
6M
14.77%
1Y
31.29%
3Y*
20.91%
5Y*
10Y*

JEPQ

1D
-2.48%
1M
0.34%
YTD
7.85%
6M
7.02%
1Y
25.10%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUGN vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TUGN
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
15.79%19.11%18.44%34.84%-18.78%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
7.85%15.18%24.85%36.28%-5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between TUGN and JEPQ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022

0.88

The correlation between TUGN and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUGN vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUGN
TUGN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
TUGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUGN Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
TUGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUGN Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ
JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUGN vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TUGNJEPQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.86

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.24

13.55

-5.31

TUGN vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUGN Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUGN and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TUGN vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUGN drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUGN and JEPQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUGNJEPQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-20.07%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.96%

-8.82%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.60%

-20.07%

-1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

-2.48%

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.38%

-3.40%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

1.86%

+1.94%

Volatility

TUGN vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) has a higher volatility of 8.01% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 6.27%. This indicates that TUGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUGNJEPQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.01%

6.27%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.65%

10.58%

+3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

13.08%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

16.79%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.32%

16.79%

+0.53%

TUGN vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUGN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TUGN vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

TUGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, more than JEPQ's 10.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
10.22%10.53%9.65%10.03%9.44%
TUGN
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
10.82%11.50%11.84%10.83%7.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, TUGN and JEPQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TUGN has higher volatility (8.01%) compared to JEPQ (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUGN dropped -23.45% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

On 3-year performance, TUGN leads with 20.91% vs 19.79% for JEPQ. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TUGN has performed better with a 20.91% return vs 19.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TUGN.

TUGN has the higher dividend yield at 10.82%, compared with 10.22% for JEPQ.

TUGN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: STF and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TUGN and 0.35% for JEPQ.

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUGN and JEPQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer