PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUGN vs. HIDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TUGN vs. HIDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUGN achieves a 18.07% return, which is significantly higher than HIDV's 10.08% return.


TUGN

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.52%
YTD
18.07%
6M
17.69%
1Y
35.45%
3Y*
21.70%
5Y*
10Y*

HIDV

1D
-0.62%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
10.08%
6M
9.64%
1Y
26.88%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUGN vs. HIDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TUGN
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
18.07%19.11%18.44%23.64%
HIDV
AB US High Dividend ETF
10.08%14.64%26.01%20.30%

Correlation

The correlation between TUGN and HIDV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023

0.79

The correlation between TUGN and HIDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TUGN vs. HIDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUGN
TUGN Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TUGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUGN Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TUGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUGN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

HIDV
HIDV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HIDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HIDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUGN vs. HIDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TUGNHIDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.40

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

2.82

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.36

12.12

-2.77

TUGN vs. HIDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUGN Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the HIDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUGN and HIDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TUGN vs. HIDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUGN drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than HIDV's maximum drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUGN and HIDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TUGNHIDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-18.76%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.96%

-9.57%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.60%

-18.76%

-2.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-1.74%

+0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.39%

-2.05%

-4.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

2.22%

+1.58%

Volatility

TUGN vs. HIDV - Volatility Comparison

STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) at 3.99%. This indicates that TUGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TUGNHIDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.74%

3.99%

+3.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.50%

9.54%

+3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.72%

12.24%

+4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

14.57%

+2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

14.57%

+2.73%

TUGN vs. HIDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUGN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HIDV's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

TUGN vs. HIDV - Dividend Comparison

TUGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.61%, more than HIDV's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HIDV
AB US High Dividend ETF
2.35%2.22%2.29%2.23%0.00%
TUGN
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
10.61%11.50%11.84%10.83%7.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


TUGN and HIDV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TUGN has higher volatility (7.74%) compared to HIDV (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUGN dropped -23.45% vs HIDV's -18.76%.

On 3-year performance, TUGN leads with 21.70% vs 21.10% for HIDV. On fees, HIDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, HIDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TUGN has performed better with a 21.70% return vs 21.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HIDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TUGN.

TUGN has the higher dividend yield at 10.61%, compared with 2.35% for HIDV.

TUGN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while HIDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: STF and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TUGN and 0.45% for HIDV.

HIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TUGN and HIDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer