TUGN vs. HIDV
TUGN (STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF) and HIDV (AB US High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TUGN is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Shelton, while HIDV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TUGN returned 18.97%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for HIDV. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TUGN charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for HIDV.
Performance
TUGN vs. HIDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TUGN having a 13.24% return and HIDV slightly lower at 12.88%.
TUGN
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- 6M
- 12.66%
- YTD
- 13.24%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.24%
HIDV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- 6M
- 10.25%
- YTD
- 12.88%
- 1Y
- 24.60%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $537.75K | $786.95K | $1.11M | |
| $660.87K | $739.29K | $807.07K |
TUGN vs. HIDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF | 13.24% | 19.11% | 18.44% | 23.64% |
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 12.88% | 14.64% | 26.01% | 20.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUGN and HIDV is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023 | 0.79 |
The correlation between TUGN and HIDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUGN vs. HIDV — Risk / Return Rank
TUGN
HIDV
TUGN vs. HIDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TUGN | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.33 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 2.41 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.22 | 10.26 | -5.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TUGN vs. HIDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUGN drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than HIDV's maximum drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUGN and HIDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUGN | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.45% | -18.76% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.96% | -9.57% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.60% | -18.76% | -2.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.40% | -0.44% | -4.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -2.02% | -4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 2.25% | +1.80% |
Volatility
TUGN vs. HIDV - Volatility Comparison
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to AB US High Dividend ETF (HIDV) at 3.22%. This indicates that TUGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUGN | HIDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 3.22% | +2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.78% | 9.63% | +5.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.86% | 12.43% | +5.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 14.46% | +2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 14.46% | +2.95% |
TUGN vs. HIDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUGN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than HIDV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TUGN vs. HIDV - Dividend Comparison
TUGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.52%, more than HIDV's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIDV AB US High Dividend ETF | 2.29% | 2.22% | 2.29% | 2.23% | 0.00% |
TUGN STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF | 11.52% | 11.50% | 11.84% | 10.83% | 7.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUGN and HIDV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUGN has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to HIDV (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUGN dropped -23.45% vs HIDV's -18.76%.
On 3-year performance, HIDV leads with 19.51% vs 18.97% for TUGN. On fees, HIDV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, HIDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HIDV has performed better with a 19.51% return vs 18.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIDV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TUGN.
TUGN has the higher dividend yield at 11.52%, compared with 2.29% for HIDV.
TUGN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while HIDV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Shelton and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TUGN and 0.45% for HIDV.
HIDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUGN and HIDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer