PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUGN vs. EAOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TUGN vs. EAOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TUGN vs. EAOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TUGN
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
-5.39%19.11%18.44%34.84%-18.78%
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
-0.60%12.90%7.29%11.83%-3.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUGN achieves a -5.39% return, which is significantly lower than EAOM's -0.60% return.


TUGN

1D
1.32%
1M
-3.51%
YTD
-5.39%
6M
-5.46%
1Y
20.45%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
10Y*

EAOM

1D
0.38%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
0.88%
1Y
10.92%
3Y*
8.70%
5Y*
3.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TUGN vs. EAOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUGN has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOM's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TUGN vs. EAOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUGN
TUGN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
TUGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUGN Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TUGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUGN Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOM
EAOM Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EAOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
EAOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAOM Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUGN vs. EAOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) and iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUGNEAOMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.95

1.37

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

1.99

-0.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.28

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

1.99

-0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.49

8.33

-2.84

TUGN vs. EAOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUGN Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the EAOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUGN and EAOM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUGNEAOMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

1.37

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.65

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between TUGN and EAOM is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TUGN vs. EAOM - Dividend Comparison

TUGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.59%, more than EAOM's 2.91% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
TUGN
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
12.59%11.50%11.84%10.83%7.58%0.00%0.00%
EAOM
iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF
2.91%2.89%2.89%2.70%1.93%1.32%1.02%

Drawdowns

TUGN vs. EAOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUGN drawdown since its inception was -23.45%, which is greater than EAOM's maximum drawdown of -20.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUGN and EAOM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TUGNEAOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.45%

-20.73%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.96%

-5.67%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.08%

-3.31%

-5.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-5.09%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

1.35%

+2.56%

Volatility

TUGN vs. EAOM - Volatility Comparison

STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF (TUGN) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to iShares ESG Aware Moderate Allocation ETF (EAOM) at 3.27%. This indicates that TUGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TUGNEAOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

3.27%

+2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.81%

4.82%

+6.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.57%

8.04%

+13.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

8.01%

+9.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.01%

7.91%

+9.10%