TUG vs. CTAP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP).

TUG and CTAP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TUG is an actively managed fund by STF. It was launched on May 18, 2022. CTAP is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Dec 8, 2025.

Performance

TUG vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TUG vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF	-6.31%	-1.33%
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.36%	2.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUG achieves a -6.31% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 5.36% return.

TUG

• 1D: 3.35%
• 1M: -4.80%
• YTD: -6.31%
• 6M: -3.64%
• 1Y: 22.12%
• 3Y*: 17.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CTAP

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: -5.40%
• YTD: 5.36%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TUG vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.

TUG

STF Tactical Growth ETF

CTAP

Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF

Return for Risk

TUG vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUG

TUG Risk / Return Rank: 62
TUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
TUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
TUG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
TUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
TUG Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUG vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TUG	CTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.57	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.55	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TUG	CTAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	1.31	-0.56

Correlation

The correlation between TUG and CTAP is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TUG vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

TUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than CTAP's 0.75% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF	1.83%	1.75%	4.97%	1.34%	1.14%
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TUG vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUG drawdown since its inception was -22.27%, which is greater than CTAP's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUG and CTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TUG	CTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.27%	-9.02%	-13.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.37%	-5.64%	-3.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.45%	-2.15%	-2.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TUG	CTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.00%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.07%	22.12%	-0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.08%	22.12%	-4.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.08%	22.12%	-4.04%