CTAP vs. RSST
CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and RSST (Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CTAP is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Simplify, while RSST is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CTAP charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for RSST.
Performance
CTAP vs. RSST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTAP achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than RSST's 16.68% return.
CTAP
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -6.46%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSST
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 9.83%
- YTD
- 16.68%
- 1Y
- 39.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTAP vs. RSST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.69% | 2.22% |
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF | 16.68% | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTAP and RSST is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTAP vs. RSST — Risk / Return Rank
CTAP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSST
CTAP vs. RSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTAP | RSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.42 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.21 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTAP vs. RSST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTAP drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, smaller than the maximum RSST drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAP and RSST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTAP | RSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.48% | -30.80% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.21% | -4.83% | -12.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -6.03% | +1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.92% | — |
Volatility
CTAP vs. RSST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTAP | RSST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.96% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.40% | 23.60% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 24.38% | +0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 24.38% | +0.02% |
CTAP vs. RSST - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTAP has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RSST's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTAP vs. RSST - Dividend Comparison
CTAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than RSST's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 1.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF | 0.96% | 1.12% | 0.09% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTAP and RSST have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RSST.
CTAP has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.96% for RSST.
CTAP is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while RSST is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CTAP and 0.99% for RSST.
Find the right allocation for CTAP and RSST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer