PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TUG vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TUG vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TUG vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TUG
STF Tactical Growth ETF
-6.31%20.43%19.37%38.24%-12.62%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
-4.37%17.72%24.89%26.18%-0.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TUG achieves a -6.31% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's -4.37% return.


TUG

1D
3.35%
1M
-4.80%
YTD
-6.31%
6M
-3.64%
1Y
22.12%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
10Y*

SPY

1D
2.91%
1M
-4.94%
YTD
-4.37%
6M
-1.82%
1Y
17.59%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
13.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TUG vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TUG has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TUG vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TUG
TUG Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TUG Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
TUG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TUG vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TUGSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.01

0.93

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.57

1.45

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.22

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.53

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.55

7.30

-0.74

TUG vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TUG and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TUGSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

0.93

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.56

+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between TUG and SPY is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TUG vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

TUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, more than SPY's 1.14% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TUG
STF Tactical Growth ETF
1.83%1.75%4.97%1.34%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.14%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Drawdowns

TUG vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TUG drawdown since its inception was -22.27%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUG and SPY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TUGSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.27%

-55.19%

+32.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-12.05%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.37%

-6.24%

-3.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-9.09%

+4.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.52%

+0.92%

Volatility

TUG vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 5.31%. This indicates that TUG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TUGSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.53%

5.31%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

9.47%

+3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.07%

19.05%

+3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.08%

17.06%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

17.92%

+0.16%